Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How have Walmart wage changes (e.g., 2015, 2019, 2022 raises) affected SNAP enrollment among its workforce?
Executive Summary
Walmart’s periodic wage increases in 2015, 2019, and 2022 coincided with company messaging about higher average pay and investments in training, but available evidence shows no clear, large-scale decline in SNAP enrollment among Walmart workers attributable solely to those raises; many analyses and reports indicate that Walmart remains a major recipient of SNAP spending and employer of SNAP beneficiaries [1] [2] [3]. Multiple studies and reporting through 2025 emphasize that structural factors — overall low wages in retail, part-time schedules, regional cost of living, and broader policy changes to SNAP — play larger roles than discrete corporate wage adjustments in determining employee reliance on food assistance [4] [5].
1. Why the Claim That Wage Hikes Would Shrink SNAP Use Sounds Plausible — But Is Not Proven
Economists and advocates often argue that raising employer wages should reduce reliance on public assistance by boosting household incomes and financial stability. Walmart publicly reported a rising average U.S. hourly wage — over $17.50 in its 2025 ESG report — and framed pay increases as investments in associates and skills training [6]. That corporate narrative supports the notion that higher wages can diminish SNAP dependency. However, multiple empirical snapshots show Walmart remained among the leading employers whose workers used SNAP and Medicaid both before and after the cited wage moves, suggesting wage increases at the corporate-average level do not automatically translate into enough income gain for the lowest-paid associates to exit benefit programs [2] [1].
2. What the Data and Reports Say: Walmart Still Captures Large Shares of SNAP Spending
Market-level and investigative reports from 2020 through mid-2025 show Walmart continues to capture a substantial fraction of SNAP dollars, with Numerator and Supermarket News reporting Walmart took in roughly 24–25% of SNAP shopper spending in 2025 and that many SNAP recipients exhaust benefits before month-end [3] [5]. Earlier studies identified Walmart as a top employer of SNAP beneficiaries, with thousands of employees on food stamps, and advocacy research has repeatedly highlighted the corporation’s workforce reliance on public programs [2] [1]. These consistent patterns indicate wage changes at Walmart have not eliminated the company’s role as a major retailer serving SNAP households, nor its workforce’s need for assistance.
3. Confounding Factors: Scheduling, Part-Time Work, Regional Costs and Policy Changes
Assessing causation between wage adjustments and SNAP enrollment requires accounting for part-time employment, variable hours, regional cost-of-living differences, and concurrent policy shifts which researchers and reporters have flagged. Analyses criticizing large employers like Walmart and Amazon emphasize that low base pay plus unpredictable scheduling produces financial instability that a modest raise cannot fully resolve [4]. SNAP enrollment trends are also sensitive to federal policy changes, unemployment cycles, and benefit rule adjustments; therefore, isolating the effect of specific company wage hikes from these broader forces is analytically challenging and not convincingly accomplished in the sources provided [5].
4. Divergent Interpretations: Corporate Reporting vs. Advocacy Research
Walmart’s ESG and corporate communications portray wage increases as meaningful associate progress, citing average hourly pay and training investments to support inclusion and retention narratives [6]. Advocacy groups and independent studies highlight persistent reliance on SNAP among retail workers and critique firms for externalizing labor costs onto the public safety net [1] [4] [2]. Both perspectives rely on truthful elements: Walmart’s reported pay gains are factual, while independent analyses documenting large numbers of employees using SNAP are also factual. The tension reflects different framings and priorities — corporate improvement metrics versus social-policy critiques emphasizing unmet basic needs.
5. Bottom Line: Limited Evidence of Direct Impact, Strong Evidence of Ongoing Reliance
Synthesizing the available material through 2025, there is no strong, directly attributable evidence that Walmart’s 2015, 2019, and 2022 raises produced a marked, measurable reduction in SNAP enrollment among its workforce. Instead, the evidence consistently shows Walmart remains a major outlet for SNAP spending and an employer with substantial numbers of employees who rely on food assistance, pointing to systemic labor-market and policy drivers beyond single-employer wage announcements [3] [5] [2]. Policymakers and researchers seeking to assess the relationship should prioritize longitudinal, worker-level data that controls for hours, location, household composition, and contemporaneous SNAP policy changes — a level of microdata not present in the cited summaries [4] [6].