Which New York‑chartered banks disclosed cutting or restricting lending relationships with the Trump Organization after February 2024?

1. The specific question being answered and the available evidence

The user’s query asks which New York‑chartered banks disclosed post‑February‑2024 restrictions or cuts to lending ties with the Trump Organization; the documents provided include contemporaneous 2021 coverage of banks severing or pausing business with Trump after the January 6 Capitol attack and a separate summary of a February 2024 New York court ruling concerning the Trump Organization, but no item in the dataset explicitly reports a New York‑chartered bank making such a disclosure after February 2024 ^{[1] [2] [4]}.

2. What the January 2021 reporting shows (relevant context often conflated with later dates)

Multiple outlets reported that in January 2021 several lenders either said they would stop doing new business with Donald Trump or closed accounts: Signature Bank (identified as New York‑based) announced it would close Trump’s personal checking and money‑market accounts and publicly criticized the president’s actions; Deutsche Bank and other lenders were reported to be refraining from new business with Mr. Trump at that time ^{[1] [2] [3]}. That 2021 wave of disclosures is well documented across the supplied sources but is temporally distinct from the user’s requested post‑February‑2024 window ^{[2] [5]}.

3. Who among those banks is New York‑chartered (and who is not)

Signature Bank is consistently identified in the supplied reporting as a New York‑based bank that severed certain ties with Trump in January 2021, including closing personal accounts disclosed to hold roughly $5.1–$5.3 million ^{[1] [3]}. Deutsche Bank—which featured heavily in the contemporaneous coverage as “Trump’s lender” and as announcing it would refrain from new business—is a German global bank with significant U.S. operations but is not a New York‑chartered U.S. bank in the sense the question implies; the sources do not describe Deutsche Bank as a New York‑chartered institution ^{[2] [6]}.

4. The February 2024 court ruling and the gap in the supplied reporting

The supplied material includes a summary of a New York civil fraud case decision issued in February 2024 that imposed financial penalties and criticized the Trump Organization’s historical financial representations, but that document does not include reporting that any New York‑chartered bank publicly announced new lending restrictions against the Trump Organization after that ruling ^[4]. The evidence set therefore leaves a gap: it documents earlier bank actions in 2021 and a legal development in February 2024, but it does not provide any source showing a New York‑chartered bank making post‑February‑2024 disclosures cutting or restricting lending ties.

5. Judgment, alternative explanations, and reporting limits

Based strictly on the provided sources, the correct answer is that no New York‑chartered bank is shown in this dataset to have disclosed cutting or restricting lending relationships with the Trump Organization after February 2024; earlier disclosures in January 2021 included New York’s Signature Bank and statements by other lenders such as Deutsche Bank, but the supplied reporting does not connect those to any post‑February‑2024 action ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}. It remains possible—outside the supplied set—that later disclosures occurred; because the dataset contains no such reporting, this analysis cannot confirm any post‑February‑2024 announcements by New York‑chartered banks and does not assert that none exist beyond these sources.