Which specific big-ticket pledges (Saudi, UAE, major tech firms) on the White House list have verifiable investment flows recorded in US federal data?

1. What the question is actually asking and why it matters

The user seeks to move beyond press releases and ask which named, “big-ticket” commitments on the White House list have concrete, verifiable entries in official U.S. federal records—meaning documented capital flows, export approvals, contracts or filings that federal agencies record—because pledges and MOUs do not equal executed foreign direct investment or recorded financial transfers ^{[1] [4]}.

2. What the reporting confirms as announced pledges or deals

The White House fact sheet and related coverage catalog large announcements: a $1.4 trillion UAE investment framework (AI, data centers, manufacturing) and a related $200 billion UAE package ^[1]; Saudi-linked commitments folded into a roughly $600 billion package and corporate pledges such as DataVolt’s $20 billion U.S. datacenter investment ^{[2] [3] [5]}; and multiple tech-firm partnerships and MOUs including a $10 billion Google Cloud–PIF AI hub plan and other vendor agreements with Nvidia, AMD, Qualcomm, and AWS ^{[6] [7]}.

3. Which items in reporting point toward verifiable, near-term transactions

Some announcements cite specific commercial contracts or orders that are the sort of transactions that could later appear in federal data: the Etihad order for Boeing 787/777X aircraft and GE Aerospace engines that the White House described as a $14.5 billion commitment is a concrete commercial purchase highlighted in the fact sheet ^[1], and export approvals for advanced Nvidia chips to Gulf firms have been reported as authorized by U.S. agencies (export approvals reported in later press accounts) ^{[8] [7]}.

4. What the supplied sources do not provide—no federal-record evidence of the big-ticket flows

None of the provided sources supply an actual federal dataset entry (e.g., Bureau of Economic Analysis FDI numbers, Treasury filings, Commerce export license registries, customs or SEC filings) showing that the headline sums—$1.4 trillion, $600 billion, $200 billion or DataVolt’s $20 billion—have been transmitted, invested, or logged as inbound U.S. investment flows ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}. The reporting consistently frames these as commitments, frameworks, memoranda, or planned investments rather than completed, federally recorded capital flows ^{[1] [9]}.

5. Distinguishing pledges, MOUs and export approvals from recorded investment flows

The reporting includes company-level MOUs and government-backed partnership plans (Google Cloud–PIF $10 billion hub, NVIDIA/AMD supply arrangements, HUMAIN/G42 partnerships) and notes federal actions like export authorizations for chips—these are steps that can precede financial flows and may generate federal records (export licenses, customs entries), but the documents here stop short of linking specific pledge sums to entries in U.S. federal statistics ^{[6] [7] [8]}.

6. Bottom line and caveats

Based on the supplied reporting, identifiable, verifiable entries in U.S. federal data for the headline White House pledge totals are not present: reporters document big commitments and some discrete commercial orders (e.g., Etihad/Boeing $14.5B) and export approvals, but not federal datasets showing the $1.4T, $600B, $200B or $20B have already registered as U.S. inbound investment flows ^{[1] [2] [3] [7]}. It remains possible that parts of these commitments will produce federally recorded flows later (and federal statistics often lag announcements), but the supplied sources do not provide that verification ^[4].