Who invests in 1784 LLC
Executive summary
Public records and business-profiling services identify at least one outside investor in 1784 Holdings (also styled 1784 Capital Holdings or 1784 Holdings LLC): Benevolent Capital is listed as an investor by PitchBook [1]. The company presents itself as a privately held, founder-led developer and owner of Class A self-storage whose investor relations are managed internally, but broader investor identities and capitalization details are not disclosed on its public sites and directory listings [2] [3] [4].
1. The named outside investor: Benevolent Capital
The clearest, attributable claim in available reporting is that Benevolent Capital has invested in 1784 Holdings, a data point surfaced by PitchBook’s company profile for 1784 Holdings [1]. PitchBook’s summary repeats the same investment line and notes other deal activity for the firm, but full deal terms and any co-investors are gated behind PitchBook access, so public visibility of the scope and timing of Benevolent Capital’s stake is limited to that single citation [1].
2. Founder and management play investor-facing roles
1784’s own site and leadership pages emphasize founder-led, privately held operations with active investor relations handled internally: Theresa Guske is described as managing portfolio and investor relations functions, and founder/CEO Shane Albers is repeatedly identified as the company’s leader and founding investor in related ventures [3] [5]. Those disclosures signal that capital-raising and ongoing communications with investors are managed in-house, consistent with many private real-estate developers who rely on direct relationships with equity partners and private capital sources [3] [5].
3. Company characterization suggests typical private real‑estate investor profile, but does not name them
Public-facing descriptions position 1784 as a national developer and owner of Class A self-storage targeting high-demand, high-barrier markets and long-term investor value—a pitch designed to attract institutional or accredited private capital [4] [2]. Directory entries (Inside Self Storage, Crunchbase, ZoomInfo, D&B) reinforce that positioning but stop short of listing limited partners, institutional backers, family offices, or pension funds by name, meaning the composition of most investors remains undisclosed in the examined sources [6] [7] [8] [9].
4. Public data gaps and the limits of available reporting
Most factual leads beyond Benevolent Capital are either company marketing language or third‑party directory summaries; PitchBook’s fuller profile is paywalled and other databases (Crunchbase, The Org, ZoomInfo) provide company descriptions without investor rosters [1] [7] [10] [8]. Therefore, while it is supported that Benevolent Capital has invested and that management handles investor relations, there is no publicly available, verifiable list of all equity investors, LPs, or deal terms in the provided sources [1] [3] [4].
5. Alternative explanations and implicit incentives in the reporting
Company-authored pages understandably frame 1784 as an attractive vehicle for capital—language about “long-term value for investors” and targeted Class A assets functions as marketing to attract more capital rather than to disclose it [4]. PitchBook’s single-line investor note could reflect a variety of arrangements (direct equity, JV, mezzanine financing, advisory stake) but the lack of detail leaves room for different interpretations; PitchBook’s paywall also creates an information asymmetry where subscribers get fuller context [1].
6. Bottom line — who invests in 1784 LLC?
The verifiable answer in available reporting: Benevolent Capital has invested in 1784 Holdings [1]. The company itself is privately held, founder-led, and markets to investors—suggesting its backers are likely private equity partners, accredited investors, or institutional real‑estate investors common to Class A self‑storage projects—but the specific roster beyond Benevolent Capital is not disclosed in the cited public sources [4] [2] [7]. Additional investor names, ownership stakes, and transaction terms would require access to paywalled datasets or private company filings that are not provided in the supplied material [1].