Who owns Burn Peak supplements and where are they headquartered?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Public records and multiple company pages list a business address for "Burn Peak" at 19655 E 35th Dr Ste 100, Aurora, CO 80011 (BBB listing) [1]. The brand markets itself via multiple official websites and press releases that describe product launches and formulations but do not provide a clear, single corporate owner name; several promotional sites and PR outlets present Burn Peak as a launched product or brand without naming an unequivocal corporate owner [2] [3] [4].
1. What the records say about ownership and the named business address
The Better Business Bureau profile for "Burn Peak" lists the business name as Burn Peak and gives a Colorado street address—19655 E 35th Dr Ste 100, Aurora, CO 80011—plus a phone number; the listing explicitly notes the business is not BBB-accredited [1]. That entry is the clearest single public-record reference to a company name and an address in the search results provided [1].
2. Brand materials emphasize the product, not a parent company
Multiple “official” Burn Peak websites and promotional pages focus on product claims, ingredients and manufacturing claims (GMP, made in USA), but they do not consistently identify a corporate owner or legal entity behind the brand in the snippets provided [3] [4] [5] [6]. GlobeNewswire and other press-distribution pieces promote a product launch for Burn Peak from New York City PR releases but present the item as a product launch rather than naming a corporate owner [2] [7].
3. PR outlets and press releases are the clearest public-facing provenance—but with limits
Press-distribution pieces (GlobeNewswire, Yahoo Finance republishing GlobeNewswire content) announce a Burn Peak launch and clarify formula details; those same items frame Burn Peak as a branded product and cite New York City as the dateline for the release, but they do not identify a corporate parent in the excerpts provided [2] [8] [7]. These releases are useful for public-facing marketing claims but do not substitute for a company-registration record showing established ownership [2] [8].
4. Third‑party reviews and consumer sites echo product claims and sometimes speculate on founders
Independent review sites and consumer-review platforms repeat marketing claims (manufactured in a US GMP facility, 60‑day guarantees) and collect user complaints about shipping and refunds [9] [10] [11]. One review site snippet attributes the product to a named individual—“Dr. Michael Lawson”—but that claim appears in a product-review article and is not corroborated by a corporate-registration source among the documents provided [12]. Available sources do not mention independent verification that Dr. Lawson is the legal owner or founder.
5. Consumer complaints and marketplace listings complicate provenance
Trustpilot and other user-review pages show customer service and refund issues for orders placed through sites claiming to sell Burn Peak; eBay listings show third-party resellers offering the capsules [10] [13]. These marketplace traces show a distributed retail presence but do not establish corporate ownership; they do, however, indicate that the brand is commercially active across multiple channels [13] [10].
6. What’s missing or inconclusive in the available reporting
None of the provided snippets contains a clear corporate registration, EIN, or a named legal entity such as "Burn Peak, Inc." with publicly verifiable ownership documents. Official sites and PR releases emphasize product formulation and being “made in the USA” but do not provide an unambiguous corporate-owner name or documented headquarters beyond marketing addresses and PR datelines [3] [4] [2]. Therefore, public-source confirmation of the legal owner is not found in current reporting.
7. What a skeptical reader should take away
Available reporting identifies a business address in Aurora, Colorado, listed under the name Burn Peak on the BBB [1] and numerous brand sites and PR releases describe the product and launch activities [3] [4] [2]. However, the absence of a clear owner name in these sources means the legal ownership and corporate structure remain unverified in the documents provided; independent verification (business-registration records, WHOIS registries for the various domains, or an SEC/State filing) would be necessary to definitively say who owns the brand. Available sources do not mention such filings.
If you want, I can search specific state business registries, WHOIS domain records for the listed websites, or copy the full BBB profile page to try to extract more ownership details.