Who owns the Neurocept trademark and what company registers it?

1. What the public sites say: “Neurocept” is marketed but ownership is opaque

Several commercial pages present Neurocept as a branded cognitive-support supplement and mention ClickBank as the retailer; those product sites repeat boilerplate retailer and trademark language but do not provide a clear corporate owner or USPTO registration number for the Neurocept mark in the snippets provided ^{[1] [2] [3]}. A promotional news release framed Neurocept as a 2025 market entrant, but it likewise focuses on product claims rather than legal ownership or trademark registration details ^[8].

2. What the trademark databases cited here show — similar names, not Neurocept

The search results include authoritative trademark entries for related names: NEUROSTAR is registered to Neuronetics, Inc. (registration number noted in the Justia snippet) ^[7] and NEUROFACTOR is tied to VDF FutureCeuticals, Inc. ^[4]. A separate application for “NEUROCEP” lists Neuro Therapy Solutions, LLC ^[6]. These entries demonstrate that similar “neuro-” marks are being registered, but the provided database snippets do not show a USPTO record for the exact “Neurocept” mark ^{[4] [6] [7]}.

3. Why a consumer or researcher might not find a USPTO owner in these results

Possible explanations consistent with the available material: the Neurocept product could be using an unregistered trademark (common for some supplements and online sellers), the mark could be registered but the result set did not include that record, or ownership could be obscured behind a third-party retailer like ClickBank, which is mentioned as the retailer on multiple pages ^{[1] [3]}. The immediate evidence in these search snippets does not present a USPTO registration number or named registrant for Neurocept ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

4. How to verify trademark ownership (actionable next steps)

The official USPTO Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS) is the authoritative place to search registrations and applications; the USPTO search portal is referenced in the results and should be used to look up “Neurocept” or variant spellings and to retrieve owner/contact data and serial/registration numbers ^[9]. Third‑party aggregators like Justia and USPTO.report can be helpful but should be cross‑checked against the USPTO database for final confirmation ^{[5] [4]}.

5. Conflicting signals and limitations in current reporting

The search results show multiple commercial Neurocept web domains and a press release promoting the supplement, suggesting active marketing ^{[1] [8] [2]}. Yet the only explicit trademark records in the snippets are for different “neuro-” marks held by other companies (Neurostar, Neurofactor, Neurocep), so available sources do not identify who, if anyone, has federally registered “Neurocept” ^{[4] [6] [7]}. I cannot assert that no registration exists because that fact is not confirmed in these sources; the correct step is to search USPTO records directly ^[9].

6. Competing interpretations to weigh

One interpretation: Neurocept is an unregistered brand used by marketers who sell through ClickBank and therefore has no publicly listed federal registrant in the provided snippets ^{[1] [3]}. Alternative interpretation: Neurocept may be registered under a corporate or attorney name not surfaced in these search snippets; third‑party databases sometimes miss or delay reflecting the latest USPTO entries, so the absence here is not definitive ^{[9] [5]}.

If you want, I can (A) construct the precise search terms and steps to run on the USPTO TESS site ^[9], or (B) run another search of the materials you provide to look for a registration number, owner name, or filing serial number for “Neurocept.”