How does Tunnel to Towers Foundation compare to similar veterans charities on Charity Navigator in 2025?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Tunnel to Towers (Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation) holds Charity Navigator’s top overall score — a 4‑star rating — and has earned perfect marks in Accountability & Transparency in past reports, with Charity Navigator recognition cited repeatedly by the charity itself [1] [2]. The foundation says it has delivered over 1,200 mortgage‑free homes and committed more than $500 million across programs, which the Charity Navigator page and the foundation’s own materials highlight as evidence of scale [1] [3].
1. Charity Navigator rating: a headline, not the whole story
Charity Navigator lists Tunnel to Towers as a 4/4 star charity, the organization’s publicly cited badge of quality that underpin fundraising claims and third‑party coverage [1]. Press materials and the foundation’s financial page emphasize this designation as a differentiator, noting multiple consecutive years at four stars [3] [2]. But the Charity Navigator entry also notes gaps: the foundation “cannot currently be evaluated by our Culture & Community methodology” and is not evaluated under Impact & Measurement for reasons that include missing constituent feedback or ineligible program types [1]. Those caveats limit how directly the star rating speaks to program outcomes.
2. What the 4‑star rating actually measures
Charity Navigator’s four‑star designation is tied to financial health, accountability, and transparency metrics; GlobeNewswire releases cited by the foundation point to a “perfect score” in Accountability & Transparency in prior years [2]. The sources make clear the rating does not equal a comprehensive verification of program impact — Charity Navigator separately assesses Impact & Measurement when charities provide constituent feedback or meet other data criteria [1]. Available sources do not provide Charity Navigator’s full scoring breakdown for 2025 beyond the overall 4 stars [1].
3. Foundation’s self‑reported scale and program claims
Tunnel to Towers public materials state the foundation has delivered more than 1,200 mortgage‑free homes and committed over $500 million across programs, and that in the current year it is delivering over 200 mortgage‑free homes and has helped house 3,000 homeless veterans [1] [3]. These figures are used prominently in fundraising and PR materials [3]. Independent verification of those specific program totals is not present in the provided sources; they are reported in the charity’s and related releases [1] [2].
4. How Tunnel to Towers compares to “similar” veterans charities on Charity Navigator
Available search results focus on Tunnel to Towers; they do not include Charity Navigator ratings for peer veterans charities for side‑by‑side comparison (not found in current reporting). The foundation and secondary outlets emphasize that Tunnel to Towers’ four‑star rating distinguishes it from peers, but specific comparative metrics, rankings, or examples of similar charities and their Charity Navigator scores are not present in the provided sources [3] [4].
5. Longevity and PR emphasis: building trust or shaping perception?
Press releases and partner pages repeatedly cite consecutive years of four‑star status—six to seven years in different statements—highlighting a narrative of sustained fiscal stewardship [2] [5] [6]. That repetition serves both donor reassurance and promotional aims. Charity Navigator’s note that certain methodology areas are unevaluated suggests the four‑star label is strongest on financial/accountability dimensions, while program impact measurement remains less illuminated in these sources [1].
6. Transparency gaps and what to watch for as a donor
Charity Navigator signals two explicit gaps: Culture & Community methodology data and Impact & Measurement evaluation are currently absent or incomplete for Tunnel to Towers [1]. Donors seeking program‑level evidence should request constituent feedback, third‑party evaluations, or IRS Form 990 details — sources mention Form 990s as part of Charity Navigator’s Encompass ratings process but do not provide them here [1]. These missing elements mean the 4‑star badge should be read alongside additional inquiry rather than as sole proof of impact.
7. Competing viewpoints and limitations of current reporting
The foundation and affiliated press materials present Tunnel to Towers as a high‑performing charity with quantifiable outputs and an exemplary Charity Navigator record [3] [2]. Charity Navigator’s page corroborates the four‑star rating but also notes methodology limits and the lack of an Impact & Measurement assessment [1]. Comparative claims that Tunnel to Towers “differs from its peers” appear in the foundation’s messaging, but the provided sources do not supply independent side‑by‑side data to substantiate superiority beyond the shared four‑star metric [3] [4].
Executive summary restated succinctly: Tunnel to Towers carries Charity Navigator’s top four‑star rating and highlights large program totals (1,200+ mortgage‑free homes; $500M committed), but Charity Navigator’s entry flags missing Culture & Community and Impact & Measurement evaluations; sources provided do not include direct, 2025 peer comparisons on Charity Navigator [1] [3] [2].