Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How does Chicago's crime rate compare to New York City's in 2025?
Executive Summary
Chicago and New York City both recorded notable declines in violent crime in early-to-mid 2025, with Chicago reporting a substantial drop in homicides and shootings and New York touting historic lows in murders and shootings; however, direct head-to-head rate comparisons for 2025 are not available in the provided sources, preventing a definitive ranking. Both cities show meaningful improvements but different emphases in reporting — Chicago highlights year-over-year percentage drops in specific categories, while New York emphasizes historic lows and broader declines across quarters, making a simple apples-to-apples comparison impossible from the supplied material [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Why Chicago’s 2025 declines are being framed as a major turnaround
Chicago officials and local reporting emphasize sharp percentage drops in violent crime during 2025: homicides down 25%, shootings down 31%, and roughly 1,000 fewer robberies compared with 2024, with April 2025 noted as the lowest monthly homicide total since February 2015. These figures portray a city in real-time retreat from peaks in gun violence and focus on near-term trends and month-to-month improvements. The reporting centers on police department data and municipal statements that frame the reductions as part of a broader national trend in falling violent crime in 2025, but it does not provide population-adjusted rates or comparisons against peer cities like New York [1] [2].
2. How New York’s narrative stresses historic lows and record-setting improvements
New York City coverage for early 2025 highlights historic lows in shootings and one of the lowest murder counts on record, especially through the first quarter of the year. The NYPD’s framing emphasizes long-term records and quarter-to-quarter declines, while also flagging rising reports in certain offenses like rape, indicating uneven progress across crime types. This narrative relies on comparative historical context within the city — “fewest shootings in recorded history” — rather than direct per-capita comparisons with other large cities. The sources portray New York’s progress as a continuation of a multi-year trend in reduced violent crime in the city [3] [4].
3. What the provided sources omit that matters for a fair comparison
None of the supplied items offer a standardized, per-100,000-resident crime rate for 2025 or synchronized timeframes that would allow a rigorous city-to-city comparison. Key omissions include population-adjusted homicide rates, consistent reporting windows, breakdowns by neighborhood, and clarity on methodological differences in how police departments classify crimes. Without those, percentage declines and record-month claims can mislead: a large percentage drop from a high baseline can still leave a city with a higher absolute rate than another city with smaller declines but lower starting levels [1] [2] [3].
4. Contrasting the metrics: percentages vs. rates vs. counts
Chicago’s sources present percentage declines and raw reductions in counts, such as thousands fewer robberies and monthly homicide totals, while New York’s sources emphasize historical lows and reduced shooting incidents across quarters. These are different metrics that tell different stories: percentage change speaks to momentum; raw counts reflect absolute scale; and per-capita rates reveal relative risk. A rigorous comparison requires all three. The current material provides momentum and record narratives but not the per-capita rates necessary to conclude which city was safer in 2025 on a population-adjusted basis [1] [3].
5. Conflicting emphases hint at political and institutional agendas
The framing in Chicago’s reporting aligns with city leaders and police narratives highlighting progress, which can bolster public confidence and political capital. New York’s reporting similarly highlights police claims of historic lows — useful for institutional validation. Media pieces about transit violence and urban order broaden the discussion to perception and commuter safety, which can be used to argue for policy shifts or funding reallocations. These emphases should be read as advocacy-adjacent: both municipal actors and media outlets have incentives to highlight improvements while downplaying persistent problems [5] [6] [1] [3].
6. How transit and public-order coverage complicates the comparison
National pieces on transit violence and public order place both cities within a broader debate about urban safety and density, noting incidents on subways and other systems in multiple cities, including Chicago and New York. This contextualizes crime as not only a city-specific statistic but part of metropolitan mobility and public perception trends, suggesting that even with falling homicides and shootings, concerns about violent incidents in public spaces remain salient and influence how residents experience safety regardless of statistical improvements [5] [6].
7. Bottom line: credible progress, but no definitive 2025 ranking from these sources
From the supplied material, both Chicago and New York made notable progress in reducing violent crime in parts of 2025, yet the absence of harmonized, per-capita, and contemporaneous statistics means the question “Which city had a lower crime rate in 2025?” cannot be decisively answered here. To settle that question, one would need synchronized 2025 rate data (homicides per 100,000, shootings per 100,000, robbery rates), standardized classification notes, and ideally third-party compilations that adjust for population and reporting differences — none of which are present in the provided analyses [1] [2] [3] [4].