How have cocaine production and export trends changed in Colombia since 2010?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Colombia’s cocaine production and the land dedicated to coca have trended sharply upward since 2010: estimates show sustained growth in cultivation and a decade-long rise in potential cocaine output that culminated in record figures in 2023 [1] [2]. That rise reflects both more hectares under coca and higher yields per hectare, while export flows remain oriented toward the United States and Europe even as criminal networks and policy shifts reshape the landscape [3] [4].
1. Production and acreage: from relative decline around 2010 to record highs by 2023
After a period in which production was lower than earlier peaks, Colombia’s coca cultivation and estimated cocaine production began an upward trajectory in the 2010s and accelerated into the 2020s: UNODC reported coca cultivation of about 253,000 hectares and a potential 2,664 metric tons of cocaine in 2023 — a 10% rise in area and a 53% jump in potential production from 2022 [1] [2], continuing an upward trend that UN data show has persisted since roughly 2013 [1] [5].
2. Productivity gains: more cocaine per hectare
Growth has not been only horizontal (more hectares) but also vertical: investigators and analysts report rising yields and productivity improvements — average coca-leaf yields per hectare increased substantially in the 2010s, and experts say one hectare can now produce roughly twice as much cocaine as a decade ago, a factor that helps explain why potential production has outpaced mere acreage growth [6] [4].
3. Exports and markets: entrenched routes to the U.S. and Europe amid shifting threats
Most of Colombia’s output is still destined for traditional markets in the United States and Europe, with reporting repeatedly noting those as primary end markets [2] [3]; at the same time officials and analysts warn of criminal innovation—more secure smuggling methods and international criminal alliances—which make supply chains more resilient and complicate interdiction [4] [7]. Some officials have speculated that rising global fentanyl demand could eventually shift producers’ incentives away from cocaine, but reporting emphasizes that, to date, cocaine remains Colombia’s dominant export crop in illicit terms [3] [7].
4. Who benefits and who fights back: armed groups, cartels and policy shifts
Armed groups, guerrillas and emerging criminal networks remain heavily involved in cultivation, processing and export, using drug revenues to fuel violence and local control [1] [8]. Policy changes have mattered: successive strategies — from aggressive eradication and aerial spraying in earlier years to the more permissive or substitution-focused approach under recent governments — have influenced outcomes, and analysts note that eradication alone has struggled to suppress production given replanting, improved cultivation techniques and fragmented criminal actors [9] [4] [2].
5. Enforcement, seizures and paradoxes in outcomes
Seizures have risen in some periods alongside production — territorial seizures rose significantly during spikes in output — but higher interdiction has not reversed the trend in potential production and acreage, producing a paradox where law enforcement measures register success on one metric while overall supply capacity climbs [9] [5]. Reporting indicates that technological and logistical changes in trafficking, plus the fragmentation of criminal groups and foreign cartel influence, blunt traditional counter-narcotics tactics [4] [7].
6. Trajectory and uncertainties: more output, persistent risks, and open questions
The empirical story since 2010 is clear: production capacity and coca area have risen, yields per hectare have improved, and by 2023 Colombia hit the highest UN-estimated potential production on record — but important uncertainties remain about actual exported volumes (as opposed to potential production), the speed and scale at which fentanyl might redirect illicit-industrial investment, and how future policy mixes (substitution, law enforcement, international cooperation) will change incentives; available reporting documents the upward trends but cannot fully resolve how export patterns or domestic political shifts will alter the course [1] [3] [4].