How have changes in Colombian coca production influenced trafficking routes through Venezuela in the 2010s and 2020s?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Rising and shifting Colombian coca production in the 2010s and 2020s reshaped regional smuggling geography by increasing pressure on border zones and feeding greater trafficker reliance on Venezuelan transit and processing space, even as Venezuela’s role remained primarily as a conduit rather than the principal source of cocaine for U.S. markets [1] [2]. Political and security changes in Colombia — notably peace processes, localized military pressure and eradication drives — combined with governance weaknesses and criminal-political collusion in Venezuela, produced a measurable eastward diversion of routes, new processing activity across the border, and an expansion of armed groups’ footprints in Venezuelan border states [3] [4] [5] [6].
1. Colombian production spikes and route pressure: more coca, more eastward flow
Colombian coca production surged through the 2010s, creating larger volumes that needed export pathways and correlating with increased trafficking flows through neighboring countries, including Venezuela; researchers documented parallel rises in cocaine transiting Venezuela when Colombian production climbed [1]. The 2012–2017 period saw a steep rise in Colombian trafficking volumes that corresponded with a roughly 56% increase in flows through Venezuela in one comparative WOLA/European brief, indicating that when Colombian output grew, traffickers diversified and intensified use of Venezuelan corridors [1].
2. Peace, eradication and displacement: how policy shifted geographies
The 2016 FARC peace process and intensified eradication and military pressure in certain Colombian regions reconfigured supply chains by displacing cultivation and processing toward borderlands and neighboring states; analysts warned that sustained Colombian pressure would likely push cultivation and base production into Ecuador and Venezuela [3] [7]. As Colombian armed actors lost their prior regulatory hold over coca in some zones, numerous groups began selling at the border or moving product earlier in the chain, reducing Colombian groups’ direct role in downstream trafficking while increasing the importance of transit states like Venezuela [7].
3. Venezuela as transit, then nascent producer and processing hub
Historically a transit bridge, Venezuela moved toward hosting more processing and production during the 2010s and 2020s: local management of labs and a growth in coca cultivation in border states like Zulia and Apure are well-documented, and observers note Venezuelan actors increasingly ran production formerly dominated by Colombians [5] [4]. Reports point to dismantled labs, downed suspect aircraft and seizures concentrated on the Colombian frontier, consistent with an expanded role for Venezuelan territory in refining and routing Colombian coca shipments [8] [5].
4. Armed groups, state actors and evolving control of corridors
Colombian guerrillas and dissidents — notably ELN and FARC dissidents — adapted by projecting operations into Venezuela, sometimes establishing labs and recruiting across the border, while evidence also implicates elements of Venezuela’s security apparatus and military in facilitating these flows, creating permissive corridors and complicating interdiction [6] [9] [5]. The ELN’s eastward push and reported seizure of coca-rich border territories exemplify how shifts in Colombian production and pressure on Colombian turf enabled armed groups to consolidate control of cross-border trafficking routes [6].
5. Route modalities: ports, airstrips and Caribbean vectors
Traffickers exploited Venezuela’s long coastline, porous border towns (Maicao–Guajira), informal airstrips in Apure, and maritime corridors to move Colombian cocaine onward to the Caribbean, Central America and transatlantic routes — patterns flagged repeatedly by U.S. and regional reporting and by trafficking studies [6] [10] [11]. While Venezuelan-connected Caribbean routes grew in prominence for some flows, larger-picture interdiction and market patterns meant most U.S.-bound cocaine still predominantly originated and transited through wider Andean-Pacific networks [12] [13].
6. Limits, contestation and the evidence gap
Several analysts and NGOs caution against overstating Venezuela as the primary supplier to U.S. markets: UNODC and other reviews indicate Andean producers remain the core source and that Venezuela often functions as transit or secondary processing space, with available estimates of cocaine transiting Venezuela varying and subject to methodological limits [1] [2]. Reporting also reflects political agendas on all sides — Colombian, Venezuelan and U.S. — so attribution of causality between Colombian production changes and specific Venezuelan trafficking growth must be read in light of uneven data, leaked documents, and competing narratives [9] [2].
Conclusion: production pushed geography; governance shaped corridors
In sum, higher Colombian coca output and policy-driven displacements in the 2010s and 2020s exerted centrifugal pressure that nudged traffickers to exploit Venezuelan borderlands for transit, processing and storage, while armed groups and complicit state actors in Venezuela converted that pressure into expanded corridors; nonetheless, major-data reviews remind that Venezuela’s role is principally as a transit/processing node linked to—but not replacing—the Andean production heartland [1] [5] [2].