Latest ice shooting facts
Executive summary
Federal immigration and border agents have been involved in multiple deadly and injurious shootings in Minneapolis in January 2026 that have sparked large protests, released videos and conflicting official accounts, and prompted state and federal inquiries; the best-established facts are that ICE or CBP agents shot and killed Renee Nicole Good on Jan. 7 and another federal agent shot and killed Alex Pretti on Jan. 24 amid broader Operation Metro Surge activity, with video evidence and local officials disputing key elements of federal statements [1] [2] [3].
1. What happened: two fatal encounters within weeks
A U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent fatally shot 37‑year‑old Renee Nicole Good in south Minneapolis on Jan. 7; multiple videos circulated showing the shooting as it occurred and incident reports and 911 transcripts portray a chaotic scene and frantic attempts to evacuate federal agents amid angry crowds [1] [4] [5]. Less than three weeks later, on Jan. 24, footage and local reports show a separate federal shooting in Minneapolis that killed Alex Pretti; federal statements say officers were conducting a targeted operation and that the agent fired after the subject violently resisted or threatened, while independent video analysis and local leaders contest aspects of that account [2] [3] [6].
2. Evidence and competing narratives
Video evidence has been central and contested: cellphone footage posted online and videos the press analyzed appear to contradict some federal descriptions of the incidents, with bystanders and local officials saying footage does not match claims that agents faced imminent vehicular attack in Good’s case and that Pretti was an unarmed AMT nurse holding a phone in the other case, according to The New York Times’ review [7] [3]. The Department of Homeland Security and its spokespeople have repeatedly defended agents’ accounts, saying the recordings corroborate their statements in at least some instances, but local officials, eyewitnesses and state investigators have raised substantial doubts [7] [4].
3. Investigations, jurisdiction and official responses
Investigations involve multiple agencies: Minneapolis police secured scenes and state investigators (Minnesota BCA) have been engaged, while the FBI and Homeland Security Investigations are also involved in probes; reporting indicates the Justice Department’s civil rights division was not expected to open an automatic investigation into the Pretti shooting, according to two senior law enforcement officials cited by The New York Times [1] [3]. The White House and DHS have emphasized federal investigatory processes even as local leaders, including the mayor and governor, have demanded federal agents leave or be constrained [8] [9].
4. Public reaction and street unrest
The twin shootings have ignited sustained protests and clashes between demonstrators and federal officers in Minneapolis, with reports of tear gas, pepper balls, large marches and more than 3,000 arrests in Minnesota cited by DHS during the unrest; scenes described in incident reports and Reuters coverage show crowds confronting agents as they tried to evacuate and aggressive responses by law enforcement at some demonstrations [10] [5] [11].
5. Politics, operations and transparency questions
These shootings occurred amid Operation Metro Surge, a large federal immigration enforcement deployment in Minnesota that has become intensely politicized; the White House press secretary framed local officials as obstructing federal law enforcement while state leaders and some members of Congress have demanded accountability and curbs on federal activity—an exchange that highlights competing agendas between federal enforcement priorities and local governance and civil‑rights advocates [8] [9].
6. What remains uncertain
Public reporting provides video, incident transcripts and multiple official statements, but key forensic facts—complete body‑cam or agent‑held camera footage, final autopsy and ballistic reports, and any grand jury or prosecutorial decisions—are either not yet public or not described in the cited coverage; therefore definitive legal conclusions about whether federal or state laws were violated remain outstanding in the sources reviewed [4] [3].