How do metropolitan-area homicide rates compare to central-city rates in 2025 (city proper vs. metro)?

Checked on December 20, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

Across reporting in 2025, homicide rates have fallen sharply in many large U.S. cities — often by double digits year‑over‑year — but the comparison between a “city proper” and its broader metropolitan area remains inconsistent: city‑limit rates are frequently higher than metro or county rates because dense central cities concentrate violence while suburbs dilute per‑capita figures [1][2][3].

1. Why “city” and “metro” often tell different stories

Crime analysts and data projects repeatedly note that results depend on the geographic unit measured: city‑jurisdiction rates can look much worse than metropolitan or county measures because many U.S. central cities are dense, compact and do not include safer suburban populations, so adding suburbs lowers the per‑100,000 homicide rate [2][3]; PolitiFact’s review of Washington, D.C., for example, explicitly explains that D.C.’s compact city limits make its city‑rate different from broader metro comparisons [4].

2. The 2025 picture — big declines but uneven geography

Multiple mid‑year and year‑to‑date analyses show homicide counts falling in 2025: a Council on Criminal Justice review finds the homicide rate in its sample of reporting cities was about 17% lower in the first half of 2025 than the same period in 2024, representing 327 fewer killings in those cities [1], while Major Cities Chiefs Association and press summaries report declines of roughly 19–21% in large cities over varying windows in 2025 [5][6]; the Washington Post also documents steady year‑by‑year declines through 2025 in several large metros that peaked in 2021 and then fell thereafter [7].

3. Which places still stand out — city limits vs. metro totals

Even with overall drops, some central cities retain very high homicide rates on a per‑100,000 basis: published compilations cite Baltimore and Detroit among cities still struggling with rates in the 30–40s per 100,000 range despite reductions, and mid‑sized cities like New Orleans and Memphis continue to rank at the top by rate [8][9][10]. At the same time, high absolute counts can appear in metropolitan or county tallies: Cook County (greater Chicago) recorded the most homicides nationally in 2023, showing that metro/county totals capture scale even when their per‑capita rates look lower than a dense central city’s [3].

4. Data limitations and why comparisons can mislead

Comparing “city proper” to “metro” is fraught: some data use city police portals, others use county or combined‑metro reporting; reporting windows vary; New York, for example, sometimes reports separately or on its own schedule, creating gaps in cross‑city samples [6][1]. Analysts caution that county proxies can be inexact because counties may contain multiple municipalities or rural areas, and some places (St. Louis, Baltimore) are independent of county structures, complicating apples‑to‑apples comparisons [3][2].

5. How to read the comparison in 2025 — a concise verdict

In 2025 the dominant pattern is: city‑limit homicide rates are often higher than metropolitan or county rates because suburbs and exurbs usually reduce the per‑capita figure when they are included, but the national story of falling homicides means both city and metro numbers moved down in many places during 2025 [2][1][5]. That said, exceptions abound: some metros register huge absolute homicide totals because they include large populations [3], and certain central cities continue to rank among the deadliest by per‑capita metrics despite recent declines [8][9].

6. What readers should watch next

Ongoing caveats matter: monthly reporting differences, jurisdictional boundaries, and the choice between counts versus rates will keep producing divergent headlines — a city can show a dramatic per‑capita decline while a surrounding county or metro shows a smaller change, or vice versa, depending on data sources and timeframes [1][6]. The balanced takeaway is that metropolitan averages usually moderate the violence seen inside central city limits, but both views are necessary to understand local public safety dynamics in 2025 [2][1].

Want to dive deeper?
How do homicide rates for city proper versus metropolitan area vary in five large U.S. metros (New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Baltimore, Detroit)?
What methodological choices (county proxy, city police data, metro statistical area) most affect homicide rate comparisons across U.S. jurisdictions?
Which specific policy interventions correlate with the 2023–2025 declines in homicides in cities cited by the Washington Post and Council on Criminal Justice?