Where can I find videos of the Minneapolis shooting that were removed or blacked out on YouTube?
Executive summary
Multiple verified bystander videos of the Minneapolis shooting that killed Alex Pretti have been published and embedded by major news organizations — including The Guardian (video), The New York Times, CNBC, BBC, PBS, Reuters, CBS and local outlets such as FOX9 — and those clips remain the most reliable places to view footage when platform-hosted copies are unavailable or removed [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. Federal body‑worn camera footage exists but, according to reporting, has not been publicly released by federal authorities or provided to state investigators at the time of these stories [9] [5].
1. Where the published, verified clips are being hosted now
Major news outlets that verified bystander video have posted playable clips and frame‑by‑frame analysis on their websites and video pages: The Guardian published eyewitness footage of the moment Alex Pretti was shot [1]; The New York Times has embedded multiple cellphone angles in its live reporting and court filings reference a witness video [2]; CNBC verified and published at least two separate bystander recordings [3]; the BBC produced a frame‑by‑frame video analysis and hosted clips [4] [10]; PBS NewsHour collected and summarized the circulating videos and their inconsistency with the federal account [5]; Reuters ran video excerpts alongside its reporting [6]; local outlets such as FOX9 and CBS Minnesota posted onlooker footage and live updates [8] [7]. Those news pages are the first reliable destinations when searching for footage that may no longer be present on a single social platform [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8].
2. Why videos might vanish from YouTube and where to look when they do
Reporting in these sources does not document systematic YouTube removals of the Minneapolis clips, but the practical reality during fast‑moving incidents is that original uploads circulate, are reshared, and sometimes are taken down for policy, copyright, or moderation reasons; therefore contemporaneous aggregation by reputable outlets — which verify and re‑host or embed clips — serves as a durable alternative when individual YouTube uploads disappear [1] [3] [5]. To follow the verified material, consult the video pages and explainers produced by the outlets above rather than individual user uploads; those organizations typically preserve clips as part of their reporting packages [1] [3] [4] [5].
3. What footage still hasn’t been publicly released and why it matters
Multiple outlets note that federal body‑worn camera footage exists but has not been provided to state investigators or released publicly, a gap that shapes the debate because the bystander videos published by newsrooms are the primary open record for now [9] [5]. Court filings and investigative reporting reference a witness‑filmed video filed with the court that was not immediately accessible in the public online court record, underscoring that some recordings are controlled by legal processes and authorities rather than freely circulating online [2].
4. Verification, narrative conflicts, and how to use these sources responsibly
News organizations that analyzed the clips found that the bystander footage often contradicts federal officials’ initial statements about the shooting, and many outlets explicitly frame the videos as central to assessing competing narratives — for example, CNBC and Reuters detail discrepancies between government accounts and what appears in video; PBS and The New York Times emphasize the role of the footage in provoking demands for independent investigation [3] [6] [5] [2]. When using these hosted clips, rely on the verified versions from established newsrooms (linked above) and note that some footage remains withheld by authorities, which limits a complete public record [9] [5].