What is the name of the country that the older shooter at Bondi Beach immigrated from?

1. Who was the older shooter — official reporting

Australian police and mainstream international outlets describe the suspects as a father-and-son duo: the son born in Australia and the father an immigrant who arrived in 1998 on a student visa and later held resident return visas; Australian officials and The Guardian report the father’s original arrival on a student visa in 1998 ^[1]. CNN and the BBC likewise report the older man as having immigrated to Australia in 1998 and identify him as an Indian national in subsequent Philippines travel records ^[2][3].

2. Passport and travel records that connect him to India

Philippine immigration authorities told CNN and other outlets the two men travelled to the Philippines in November 2025 and that the father used an Indian passport while his son used an Australian passport; Bloomberg and BBC reporting repeats that the father was recorded as an Indian national on those entry documents ^[2][4][3].

3. What sources explicitly say — convergence and nuance

The Guardian states the younger man is Australian-born and that “his father had arrived in the country on a student visa in 1998” ^[1]. CNN and BBC add the detail that Philippine authorities logged the older man entering the Philippines on an Indian passport in November 2025 ^[2][3]. Bloomberg’s headline likewise refers to Philippine statements that the father and son visited on Indian passports, underscoring official border records ^[4].

4. What this does — and does not — prove about nationality and identity

The available reporting ties the older shooter to India via passport and travel records and describes his 1998 immigration to Australia; those are documentary and official-record claims cited by multiple outlets ^[1][2][3]. Available sources do not mention whether he retained Indian citizenship, held dual nationality, or the full sequence of his Australian residency status beyond the student visa, later partner visa and resident return visas noted by The Guardian ^[1]. Do not assume other legal statuses — sources do not specify them beyond those cited.

5. Why outlets emphasize the India link — context and potential agendas

Media focus on the Indian passport and student-visa arrival stems from official immigration and Philippine border records cited to verify travel just weeks before the attack ^[2][3]. This is factual reporting of documents, but be alert that such emphasis can feed narratives about immigration and security; The Guardian also specifies the later visa pathway (student → partner visa → resident return visas), which complicates simple “foreign-born = threat” framings ^[1]. Different outlets foreground different details: some stress travel to the Philippines (CNN, BBC), others the long-ago student visa and subsequent residency (The Guardian).

6. Alternate angles in reporting and unanswered questions

Reporting consistently identifies the father as having used an Indian passport for recent travel and having arrived in Australia in 1998, but the sources differ or omit on whether he remained solely an Indian national or acquired Australian citizenship; The Guardian notes the son is Australian-born, but does not say the father was ever naturalised ^[1]. Bloomberg and Philippine-sourced coverage establish the passport fact for the November trip, but available sources do not mention other passport holdings or nationality paperwork beyond that ^[4][2].

7. Takeaway for readers seeking clarity

On the central factual point you asked: multiple reputable outlets report the older shooter immigrated from India — he arrived in Australia in 1998 on a student visa and was recorded as using an Indian passport on travel to the Philippines in November 2025 ^[1][2][3]. For further legal or biographic specifics (naturalisation status, full visa history), available sources do not mention those details and further official records or reporting would be needed (not found in current reporting).