Are there links to unedited alex pretti shootings?

1. Bystander video links exist and have been published by major news organizations

Multiple angles of bystander footage showing the moments before and during the confrontation have been posted online and republished by outlets including The New York Times, CNBC, the BBC and PBS, which verified and analyzed those clips for the public record ^{[2] [1] [4] [3]}. Those videos show Pretti visible holding a phone when agents first approached and capture the struggle and the subsequent shots, and news organizations have embedded or described those bystander recordings in their reporting for viewers to review ^{[1] [2] [4]}.

2. The “unedited” phone video that may be central to the case has not been produced publicly

Reporting repeatedly highlights that the phone Pretti was holding likely contains a critical unedited recording but that federal officials have not released that footage or shared it with state investigators; PBS and other outlets specifically note the phone video as a key piece of evidence that remains unavailable to the public ^[3]. A federal court issued a temporary restraining order directing the Department of Homeland Security not to alter or destroy evidence tied to the killing, underscoring that investigators and the public are still awaiting agency-held materials ^[5].

3. Federal accounts and agency-controlled footage remain contested and are the subject of scrutiny

Federal officials initially stated Pretti “approached” officers with a 9mm handgun, an account that some outlets report did not specify whether the weapon was in his hands or on his person ^[2]. Video published by The Washington Post shows an agent emerging from a scramble holding a gun taken from Pretti’s waistband seconds before shots are fired, a sequence that some interpret differently from the bystander clips and that has fueled debate over timing and justification ^[6]. Meanwhile, the Department of Homeland Security and Trump administration figures have issued definitive statements defending the shooting — statements that many outlets say contradict what the bystander footage shows ^{[7] [1]}.

4. What is—and isn’t—publicly linked: practical answer to the “are there links to unedited shootings?” question

Yes — there are public links to multiple bystander videos and news articles that embed and analyze them; those clips have been verified and published by The New York Times, CNBC, BBC, PBS and others and are therefore accessible to readers through those outlets ^{[2] [1] [4] [3]}. No — the specific unedited footage from Pretti’s phone and the raw agency-controlled recordings have not been made public according to available reporting, and federal officials have not released that material to independent investigators or the press as of these reports ^{[3] [5]}. Because the agency-held footage and the phone’s raw file are not publicly posted, definitive answers about exactly when and how a weapon became visible depend on evidence that remains out of public view or under legal protection ^{[3] [5]}.

Conclusion: viewers can and should review the bystander videos published by major outlets to evaluate what is visible onscreen, but there is, as yet, no publicly available link to the unedited phone footage or unredacted federal videos that could conclusively settle the conflicting narratives reported by officials and by eyewitness video ^{[1] [2] [3] [6]}.