What video shows the angle where pretti is shot
Executive summary
The clearest publicly available angle showing the moment Alex Pretti is shot is a dash‑cam/inside‑car bystander video taken at street level near where he died; that clip captures the close‑up chaos as agents swarm Pretti and the first shots ring out [1]. Multiple other bystander videos from different viewpoints — including sidewalk footage reportedly from a woman in a pink coat and a witness video shared with The New York Times — provide corroborating, overlapping perspectives of the same few seconds and together contradict key elements of the initial federal narrative [2] [3].
1. The dash‑camera/inside‑car clip: the angle that shows the shooting
A video shot from inside a nearby car — described by TMZ as “shot from inside a car right where Pretti was killed” — offers the most immediate, close‑range view of the moment agents converge and the first shots are fired, with bystanders audible and the action unfolding within the camera’s proximity [1]. That footage has been cited by multiple outlets as one of the primary bystander angles that undercuts official claims about how the encounter began and who posed an immediate threat [4] [1].
2. Sidewalk and street‑level witness videos that confirm timing and sequence
Other bystander videos — notably one reported to come from the direction of a woman in a pink coat filming from the sidewalk — show the shooting from a slightly different street‑level vantage and appear to be closer than the Glam Doll Donuts footage, supplying overlapping frames that let analysts synchronize events across angles [2]. The New York Times also published a witness video shared by a source and her lawyer that, together with social media clips, documents the rapid sequence in which officers fire multiple rounds within seconds [3].
3. What the multi‑angle footage together appears to show
Synchronized review across these bystander angles and newsroom analyses indicates agents fire roughly 10 shots in about five seconds and that some of those shots occur after a firearm appears to have been removed from the immediate scrum; closeups show agents restraining Pretti on the ground immediately before and during the volley [5] [3]. Newsroom frame‑by‑frame analysis highlights that the first shooter turns and fires after being notified — on camera — that Pretti had a gun, and that subsequent shots continue even when Pretti is prone and apparently disarmed [5].
4. Official footage exists but has not been publicly released
The Department of Homeland Security has confirmed investigators are reviewing body‑worn camera videos from the agents involved, which could provide additional authoritative angles but have not been released to the public as of reporting [6]. That admission fuels public demand for the agency’s internal footage because the bystander clips show elements that appear at odds with DHS’s early accounts about the encounter [6] [4].
5. Competing narratives and the limits of current footage
Federal officials initially described Pretti as approaching agents with a semi‑automatic handgun and violently resisting disarmament; bystander videos from the dash‑cam and sidewalk perspectives have been widely cited by news organizations as contradicting that portrayal and prompting scrutiny of the agents’ use of force [3] [4]. Analytic teams differ on interpretations of intent and threat — some legal analysts argue prior confrontations captured on other footage may bear on officers’ perceptions — but none of the public clips definitively capture everything that led to the shooting, and DHS bodycam material could change or clarify contested moments [7] [6].
6. Where this leaves the public record and what to watch next
For now, the dash‑cam/inside‑car bystander video is the principal public angle that shows Pretti being shot, and it should be viewed alongside the sidewalk and other bystander videos that together enable frame‑by‑frame reconstruction [1] [2] [5]. The release of DHS body‑worn camera footage and any higher‑definition surveillance angles — if and when they are made public — will be essential to resolving outstanding disputes about timing, threat perception, and whether subsequent shots were justified [6].