Have any public debates or controversies arisen about Jingle Bells being racist recently?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
A fresh controversy flared in December 2025 after former MSNBC host Joy Reid reposted a viral video arguing that “Jingle Bells” has roots in 19th‑century blackface minstrelsy, prompting widespread media reaction and cultural pushback [1] [2]. Scholarly work cited in reporting traces the song’s first known public performance to an 1857 minstrel show and a 2017 academic paper is frequently invoked as the origin of the claim [1] [3].
1. How the debate re‑ignited this December
The immediate spark was Joy Reid sharing an Instagram video that asserted “Jingle Bells” — originally titled “The One Horse Open Sleigh” — was first performed in a minstrel show and therefore linked to racist mockery of Black people; national outlets, conservative commentators and culture sites replayed and amplified the claim within hours [4] [5] [2].
2. What the reporting points to in the historical record
Multiple news pieces cite a 2017 Cambridge University Press paper and research by scholars (notably Kyna Hamill, identified in reporting) that found evidence the song’s earliest known public performance occurred in a Boston minstrel show in September 1857, presented by a performer in blackface [3] [1]. Contemporary coverage repeats that linkage as the factual basis for concerns about the song’s origins [6] [7].
3. What proponents of the “racist origin” view say
Writers and outlets spotlighting the claim argue the song’s first performance context matters: inclusion in a minstrel repertoire connects “Jingle Bells” to a theatrical form built on dehumanization, and that association alone is sufficient to call attention to problematic origins even if the surviving lyrics are innocuous [7] [1].
4. What critics and skeptics argue
Conservative and skeptical outlets framed Reid’s amplification as an overreach and cultural provocation, arguing she either misrepresents scholarship or is unnecessarily spoiling a holiday tradition; several commentaries focus on the political ramifications of amplifying the claim rather than engaging deeply with archival evidence [8] [9] [5].
5. Disputes about authorship, motive and biography
Some reports emphasize contested biographical claims about James Lord Pierpont — including assertions that he later fought for the Confederacy — to suggest motive or context, while other reporting notes those biographical elements are used rhetorically in the viral video rather than proving a direct intent to mock Black people in the song’s lyrics [2] [4]. Available sources do not mention definitive new archival proof that Pierpont explicitly wrote the song to ridicule Black people beyond its minstrel performance context [3].
6. How commentators framed Reid’s role and intent
Coverage is split on whether Reid endorsed the video’s strongest claims or simply amplified a provocative piece of history: some outlets say she “shared” the video and thereby rekindled debate, while others treated her post as a clear statement that the song is racist — the disagreement fuels the media backlash [10] [2].
7. Previous instances and institutional reactions
Reporting recalls earlier flashpoints — for example, a school reportedly removed “Jingle Bells” from a concert over similar concerns — showing this is not a wholly new line of inquiry but one that surfaces periodically as cultural historians and activists re‑examine familiar material [11] [2].
8. Limits of current public reporting and unanswered questions
Contemporary coverage leans heavily on the 2017 scholarly finding about an 1857 minstrel performance; beyond that, the available pieces do not produce a consensus among historians that the song’s lyrics themselves were authored as a racist text or that the author’s personal motives are conclusively proven [3] [1]. Available sources do not mention recently discovered primary documents that incontrovertibly show Pierpont’s intent to mock Black people.
9. Why this matters now — competing agendas at play
The story functions politically as much as historically: boosters of the claim frame it as overdue historical truth‑telling, critics treat it as part of a “culture war” attempt to cancel traditions, and both sides use Joy Reid’s high profile to amplify their narratives [9] [8] [10]. Each outlet’s ideological bent shapes how strongly it treats the historical evidence.
10. Takeaway for readers
Reporting shows credible scholarship links “Jingle Bells” to minstrel performance in 1857, and that fact underpins the recent controversy sparked by Reid’s reposting [1] [3]. Whether the song should be labeled “racist” depends on how one weighs an early performance context against the neutral content of surviving lyrics — the public debate reflects competing interpretations and political agendas more than a single settled historiographical verdict [7] [2].