Why do people like 67
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
“67” — pronounced “six seven” — became a viral, largely meaningless slang phrase in 2025 after a rapper’s lyric and a basketball‑game clip propelled it across TikTok, classrooms and mainstream media; Dictionary.com named it Word of the Year after searches surged more than sixfold [1] [2]. Origin traces point to Skrilla’s song “Doot Doot (6 7)” (released Dec. 2024) and to viral basketball highlights — notably clips of 6‑foot‑7 players and a widely shared “67 Kid” hand gesture — which together turned repetition and ambiguity into cultural currency [3] [4] [2].
1. How a lyric became a contagion: music, memes and a hand gesture
The immediate spark for “67” was Skrilla’s December 2024 track “Doot Doot (6 7),” whose hook — including the phrase “6‑7” — was clipped and layered over basketball edits; TikTok creators synced it to highlights of players listed at 6‑7, and a viral video of a boy performing an emphatic two‑hand, see‑saw gesture (the “67 Kid”) pushed the phrase into schools and feeds nationwide [3] [4] [2].
2. Why ambiguity helped, not hurt, spread
Unlike traditional slang with a fixed meaning, “67” thrives because it resists definition: Dictionary.com explicitly noted it “has no real definition” and yet functions as a social signal — an inside joke that marks group membership among Gen Alpha and younger Gen Z users [1] [4]. Media coverage ties the term’s power to repetition and deliberate confusion, arguing that the refusal to pin down meaning makes it more contagious [5].
3. Platforms and amplification: where it lived and why it dominated
TikTok analytics show the hashtag #67 exploded in late summer and fall 2025, and the sound migrated across X, YouTube and offline moments (schoolrooms, restaurants). High‑visibility boosters — Overtime Elite players, viral YouTubers, and NBA highlights (LaMelo Ball, who is 6‑7) — normalized and broadened use beyond the meme’s original circle [5] [4] [6].
4. Institutional recognition and commercialization
Mainstream institutions treated the trend as notable cultural data rather than a lexical problem: Dictionary.com named “67” its 2025 Word of the Year after searches surged more than sixfold, and outlets from NPR to CBS reported the choice while acknowledging the term’s lack of definition [1] [4] [7]. Businesses responded too: reports say In‑N‑Out paused using ticket number 67 because in‑store calls were disrupted by customers reacting to the meme [8] [9].
5. Why kids latch on: play, identity and schoolyard dynamics
Journalistic and education reporting tie the phrase’s resonance to familiar dynamics: short, repeatable chants and gestures spread quickly in groups of children and early teens because they are simple, funny and handy for attention‑getting. Teachers and schools saw the trend endure as students returned for the school year, which accelerated visibility and classroom use [10] [6].
6. Competing readings and a warning about overinterpretation
Some commentators treat “67” as harmless, nonsensical play that signals belonging; linguists and the phrase’s creator both resist a fixed meaning — Skrilla has said he “never put an actual meaning on it” and prefers that it remain undefined [3] [2]. Other coverage raises concerns that meaninglessness can mask unintended connotations or disruptive behavior — reporting has noted debates about inappropriate connotations and schools restricting the chant [5] [11]. Available sources do not mention any verified link between “67” and organized malicious activity beyond isolated disruptions (not found in current reporting).
7. Cultural consequences: memetic lifecycle and what may come next
The meme demonstrates how modern slang can move from niche audio clip to national phenomenon: the path — song lyric → sports edit → viral kid clip → classroom ubiquity → Dictionary recognition — is now a template for digital culture. But attention can fade; Dictionary.com and journalists alike note that institutional recognition sometimes accelerates decline, and the same features that made “67” contagious (simplicity, ambiguity) also make it ephemeral [1] [4].
8. Bottom line for observers and parents
“67” is best understood as a generational, playful in‑group marker rooted in a rapper’s lyric and amplified by sports clips and a viral child’s gesture; it has real social impact (search spikes, classroom disruptions, business responses) despite lacking a stable semantic meaning [3] [1] [8]. Those tracking the phenomenon should watch whether the term’s ambiguity yields productive cultural play or persistent nuisance — both outcomes are documented in current reporting [5] [11].