What other competitors proposed delivery schedules and contract terms for Canada's fighter replacement program in 2025?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
In 2025 Ottawa reopened consideration of alternatives to its previously planned purchase of 88 F‑35As after political friction with the United States, prompting public discussion of several rival offers including Sweden’s Saab JAS‑39 Gripen E, France’s Dassault Rafale, Boeing’s F/A‑18 Super Hornet (previously in the contest), the Eurofighter family and multinational next‑generation programs such as the UK‑led Tempest/GCAP; government pages note an open competition framework and existing industrial ties to the F‑35 program [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Official Canadian procurement materials record that the process is an open competition and that Canada has committed industrial participation and payments into the Joint Strike Fighter (F‑35) program as of early 2025 (over US$3.3 billion in Canadian contracts cited, and $935 million committed for initial jets as of 31 March 2025) [5] [6].
1. Who the public contenders were: Gripen, Rafale, Super Hornet and Eurofighters
Media reporting and defence writers in 2025 repeatedly named Saab’s Gripen E, Dassault’s Rafale, and Boeing’s Super Hornet among the practical alternatives Canada was considering or that had been in the earlier competition; Eurofighter variants were also mentioned as potential European options [3] [2] [7]. Several outlets note that Boeing’s Super Hornet had been removed earlier from the formal CF‑18 replacement contest after a political trade dispute, leaving primarily the F‑35 and Gripen in the earlier procurement cycle [3].
2. Industrial and programmatic reality: the F‑35’s deep Canadian ties
Canada’s procurement website and the Auditor General reporting show Ottawa launched an “open and fair” competition and that Canadian industry already had substantial industrial work under the Joint Strike Fighter program — over US$3.3 billion reported in contracts and roughly $935 million committed to initial production and long‑lead items as of March 31, 2025 — facts that limit how quickly and cheaply a full pivot could occur [5] [6].
3. New generation and collaborative projects entered the conversation (Tempest, GCAP/GCAP mentions)
Beyond immediate off‑the‑shelf fighters, commentators and some outlets floated next‑generation multinational programs — the UK‑led Tempest / Global Combat Air Programme and broader GCAP-style efforts — as possible long‑term options for Canada to join or influence, though those programs are developmental and not immediate delivery solutions [4] [2]. Sources emphasize these would be multi‑year, partnership‑heavy undertakings rather than near‑term replacements [4] [2].
4. Delivery schedules and contract terms: what sources explicitly say (and what they do not)
Reporting in 2025 reiterated earlier stated schedules that originally projected first F‑35 deliveries “as early as 2025” under the 2022 decision, and the government maintained the framework to buy 88 jets, but the sources available do not provide alternate vendors’ concrete, rival delivery schedules or definitive contract terms for 2025 proposals — coverage frames options and political intent rather than published competing delivery timetables or signed contracts [3] [5] [1]. In short: sources mention alternatives and timelines for the F‑35 program, but do not publish binding, rival delivery schedules or commercial terms for Gripen, Rafale, Eurofighter or Tempest as of these reports [3] [5] [4].
5. Competing narratives: capability, cost, sovereignty and industrial benefit
Advocates for Gripen and other European fighters pitched lower operating costs and diversification away from U.S. dependency; proponents of the F‑35 pointed to fifth‑generation capability and interoperability with NORAD/NATO. Some commentary accused political factors of driving any pivot, while other analyses stressed operational risks and industrial commitments tied to the F‑35 — a clear conflict of perspectives reflected across outlets [7] [8] [6].
6. What remains unclear and why it matters for a 2025 procurement decision
Available sources do not mention concrete, rival contract proposals in 2025 that specify delivery schedules, numbers, pricing or offset packages comparable to the F‑35 agreements; they primarily list candidate types and political rationale for reconsideration [3] [2] [1]. That absence matters: without published bids showing signed delivery timetables and binding terms, Ottawa could not switch suppliers without new negotiations, potential industrial and budgetary penalties, and time‑consuming certification and integration work [6] [5].
7. Bottom line for readers: options exist but are not turnkey
Canada in 2025 publicly entertained Gripen, Rafale, Eurofighter family jets, Boeing hardware previously in the race, and even future multinational programs as alternatives to the F‑35; however, official documents and reporting show deep Canadian industrial and financial ties to the F‑35 and do not provide rival vendors’ firm 2025 delivery schedules or contract terms — meaning any pivot would require fresh, complex legal, industrial and fiscal decisions [3] [2] [5] [6].