Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How does the current unemployment rate compare to the rate under previous administrations?
Executive summary
The most recent official monthly reading shows the U.S. unemployment rate at 4.4% in September 2025, up from 4.3% in August and higher than 4.1% a year earlier (September 2024) [1]. Independent trackers and outlets broadly confirm a rise to about 4.4% in late‑2025 and note complicating factors — chiefly a federal shutdown that disrupted October data collection and makes month‑to‑month comparisons less certain [2] [3].
1. What the headline number says: a small rise to still‑low territory
The Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Employment Situation summary reports the household‑survey unemployment rate at 4.4% for September 2025 and the number of unemployed at 7.6 million; both “changed little” in that month but are higher than a year earlier when the jobless rate was 4.1% and unemployed were 6.9 million [1]. Reuters, The New York Times and other outlets echo that the unemployment rate edged up to 4.4% and flagged the increase as modest rather than dramatic [2] [4].
2. How this compares to recent administrations — short answer from available reporting
Available sources do not provide a full, administration‑by‑administration comparison table within the supplied results. The materials provided establish the current reading (4.4%) and note historical context (e.g., record high 14.8% in April 2020 and record low 2.5% in May 1953 referenced by Trading Economics/Fed data), but they do not map unemployment rates across past presidential terms in the clipped search results [5] [1]. Therefore, a definitive side‑by‑side comparison by administration is not found in the current reporting.
3. What reporters and analysts are emphasizing — labor‑force flows and data gaps
Journalists and analysts stress that the rise to 4.4% partly reflected more people entering the labor force than immediately finding work — the household survey showed 470,000 people entered the labor force in September while household employment rose by about 251,000 [2] [4]. Commentators likewise point to cooling hiring, elevated continuing claims and sectoral weakness even as 4.4% remains low by long‑run standards [6] [7].
4. Why October 2025 comparisons are tricky: the shutdown effect
Multiple accounts warn that October 2025 figures are unreliable or missing because a 43‑day federal shutdown prevented BLS from collecting household survey data for the October reference week; BLS canceled the October release and combined establishment data with November’s report, and private models (e.g., Chicago Fed) stress higher uncertainty when estimating changes across the two‑month gap [2] [8]. Reuters and the Chicago Fed explicitly caution that October’s true unemployment rate may be understated or difficult to measure and that furloughed federal workers (Congressional Budget Office estimate up to 750,000) could affect the rate [3] [2].
5. Deeper signals: longer durations and graduate outcomes
Beyond the headline, Federal Reserve and regional Fed commentary highlights growing long‑term unemployment and trouble for new labor market entrants: one Fed piece notes long‑term unemployed made up roughly a quarter of the unemployed and that new college graduates’ unemployment averaged 5.3% in early 2025 versus 4.1% in 2022 [9]. Those shifts imply that even a modest headline uptick can mask strain for particular groups [9].
6. Competing perspectives on how worrying this is
Some outlets frame 4.4% as still “low by historical standards,” suggesting the labor market retains resilience (Business Insider excerpt) [6]. Others — including Reuters and NYT reporting — treat the uptick as a flag for policymakers and the Fed because it could signal a softening that matters for interest‑rate decisions and hiring outlooks if the trend continues [2] [4]. Both perspectives appear in the supplied coverage: one emphasizes relative historical strength [6], the other underscores recent cooling and data uncertainty that could presage broader weakness [2] [7].
7. What’s missing and what to watch next
Available sources do not supply a complete historical comparison by presidential administration in these snippets, so readers seeking that specific breakdown should consult BLS or FRED historical series for month‑by‑month rates across administrations (not found in current reporting) [10]. Short‑term watch items in current coverage include the combined October–November BLS release (timing noted), continuing claims and private payroll measures (ADP), and Chicago Fed model updates — all of which analysts say will clarify whether the 4.4% reading is a blip or start of a trend [2] [8] [7].
Note on sources and limits: this analysis draws only on the supplied BLS release, Reuters, regional Fed commentary, Trading Economics/FRED references and related coverage; the supplied material gives a clear recent reading (4.4% for September 2025) and flags measurement complications from the October shutdown, but does not itself present a complete administration‑by‑administration comparison [1] [2] [3] [10] [8].