How did the economy perform in Trump's second term across GDP, unemployment, and inflation metrics?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Through the first year of President Trump’s second term the data and commentary are mixed: official releases and administration statements highlight strong GDP beats — for example a revised Q2 2025 GDP of 3.8% cited by the White House [1] — while independent reporting and analysts flag slowing job growth, a modest rise in unemployment to the low‑4% range and inflation running near ~3% by late 2025 [2] [3] [4]. Observers disagree on causes and outlooks: proponents point to robust consumer spending, investment and narrowed trade gaps [1], while critics warn tariffs, policy uncertainty and slowing hiring are producing warning signs on jobs and prices [2] [5].
1. Growth: “Explosive” beats and cautious forecasters
The administration has emphasized stronger‑than‑expected GDP prints — notably a second‑quarter 2025 final read revised up to 3.8% (White House release) — and argues consumer spending, higher incomes and a narrowing trade deficit are driving momentum [1]. Outside forecasters see more modest outcomes: the OECD raised its U.S. growth forecast to about 2.0% for 2025 and explicitly noted U.S. growth remains below the 2024 pace [6]. Independent trackers and think tanks caution that headline quarterly spikes can mask uneven sector performance and the short‑term effects of tariffs and fiscal moves [7] [8].
2. Jobs and unemployment: still low, but the tempo has slowed
Labor markets remained relatively tight in early to mid‑2025, with official summaries noting the unemployment rate "just over 4 percent" and more than 600,000 payroll jobs created in the administration’s first five months (U.S. Treasury statement) [9]. But multiple outlets report hiring slowed later in the year — including a jobs report showing just 22,000 payrolls added in August and an unemployment tick to about 4.3% — prompting concern that the labor market has cooled [10]. Analysts at CEPR and others likewise note unemployment “remains relatively low” but jobs are concentrating in specific sectors such as healthcare, suggesting a softer breadth of gains [5].
3. Inflation: fell from pandemic peaks but rose again to roughly 3%
Inflation has eased markedly from the 2022 peak but has shown a renewed increase through 2025. Business Insider and The Atlantic report inflation near 3% by late 2025 and warn the administration’s tariff program is inflationary by raising import costs, complicating Trump’s promise to bring prices down [3] [11]. Reuters, AP and other outlets register consumer unease about higher prices and falling confidence despite some official readings of stable core inflation earlier in the year [12] [7] [2]. The Treasury said most inflation readings were “stable‑to‑lower” in Q2, though energy prices were volatile [9].
4. Policy drivers and contested causation
Observers disagree sharply on what is driving the metrics. The White House credits tax, deregulatory and energy policies for stronger GDP and investment [13] [1]. Critics — academic networks like CEPR, The Atlantic and reporting from AP/Fortune — point to an aggressive tariff ramp, policy unpredictability, and executive‑branch churn as sources of uncertainty that are cooling hiring and lifting consumer prices in key categories [8] [11] [2]. CEPR and others also warn the administration’s style (rapid, numerous executive actions) has deepened uncertainty and could weigh on longer‑term growth prospects [8] [5].
5. Political and sentiment gap: numbers vs. everyday experience
Multiple polls and news reports show a political gap between some macro indicators and public sentiment: consumer confidence fell and approval on the economy declined in 2025 even when certain headline statistics were solid [12] [14]. Commentators note that while stock markets and some GDP releases look favorable, rising grocery and energy bills, and complaints about affordability, are shaping voter views ahead of the 2026 midterms [15] [3].
6. How to read these figures: limitations and what’s missing
Available sources document strong quarterly GDP reads, unemployment hovering in the low‑4% range, and inflation near 3% — but they also show disagreement about trajectory and cause [1] [9] [3]. Sources do not provide a full year‑end, consolidated table comparing quarterly GDP, unemployment and CPI in one place; nor do they contain complete consensus forecasts past late 2025 — those figures are "not found in current reporting." Analysts warn that tariff timing, litigation, and executive‑branch instability create forecasting risk [8] [16].
Conclusion
The first year of Trump’s second term delivered mixed results: headline GDP readings produced notable upside reports [1] while labor markets cooled and inflation re‑accelerated to roughly 3% — eroding public confidence [10] [3]. Partisan and institutional sources disagree on whether recent strength is durable or built on policy moves that will raise costs later; that disagreement is central to how economists and voters interpret the data [8] [5].