What were annual U.S. manufacturing output growth rates under Trump (2017–2020) versus Biden (2021–2025)?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
A precise year-by-year series of U.S. manufacturing output growth rates for 2017–2020 (Trump) versus 2021–2025 (Biden) cannot be calculated from the documents supplied, because those sources emphasize jobs, selective production trends, and political claims rather than publishing a complete set of annual manufacturing output growth figures; reporting does indicate manufacturing industrial production rose under Biden through fall 2022 then flattened (FactCheck/Fed data) and that large partisan reports stress job gains under Biden versus stagnation under Trump (BlueGreen Alliance, PolitiFact, CBS) [1] [2] [3] [4]. The materials therefore allow a qualitative comparison—Biden-era recovery and policy-driven job growth versus mixed Trump-era performance and contested claims about output—but not the exact annual growth rates the question requests [1] [2] [5].
1. What the sources actually report about output versus jobs
The supplied reporting repeatedly distinguishes jobs from output: independent fact-checkers and the Fed’s industrial production series are cited to say industrial production increased under Biden until late 2022 and then largely stagnated, while many advocacy and news pieces emphasize the net addition of manufacturing jobs under Biden—figures like roughly 729,000 to 775,000 jobs are reported by CBS, FactCheck, BlueGreen Alliance and others—whereas Trump’s term saw earlier gains but finished with a net loss in manufacturing jobs driven by pandemic fallout and pre‑pandemic plateauing [1] [2] [6] [4].
2. Why the precise annual output growth series is missing from these sources
None of the provided items delivers a clean table of annual manufacturing output growth rates for each calendar year 2017–2025; the Federal Reserve industrial production commentary cited by FactCheck is summarized ("rose until fall of 2022 and has remained relatively stagnant ever since") but the actual year-by-year percentages are not printed in the snippets provided, and partisan releases (Trump campaign, White House memo) offer selective rates and short-run monthly annualized numbers rather than a consistent annual series suitable for direct comparison [1] [7] [5] [8].
3. What can be reliably said from the supplied evidence
From the supplied evidence, the defensible, sourced claims are: industrial production increased during the early Biden years through late 2022 and then flattened according to Fed data referenced by FactCheck [1]; Biden-era reporting and advocacy groups credit substantial manufacturing job gains (roughly 700–775k) and tie future growth to major laws like the IRA, Infrastructure and CHIPS Acts [2] [6] [9]; Trump-era narratives emphasize pre‑pandemic production gains but are contested by fact-checkers and independent reporting noting that manufacturing growth "all but plateaued" before the pandemic and that pandemic-era job losses left Trump’s net manufacturing jobs lower at exit [2] [5] [4].
4. Competing narratives and potential agendas in the sources
Advocacy reports from the BlueGreen Alliance frame the Biden record as superior on jobs, investment and cleaner manufacturing, which aligns with their pro‑labor and environmental agenda and cites legislative programs that benefit their priorities [2] [10]. Campaign or White House pronouncements highlight selective short‑term output spikes or annualized rates to bolster political claims—e.g., a White House 2025 memo cites a 1.8% surge in early Trump‑term manufacturing output and Trump campaign materials stress rapid production growth in early terms—yet these are selective slices rather than full annual series and should be treated as partisan framing [7] [5] [8]. Independent fact‑checkers and reporters (FactCheck, PolitiFact, CBS, Axios, The Guardian) attempt to reconcile job counts and Fed/ BLS measures but still stop short of publishing the full annual output rate series in the excerpts provided [1] [3] [4] [11] [12].
5. Bottom line and what would close the gap
The supplied sources support a qualitative conclusion: Biden’s term shows stronger manufacturing job recovery and early industrial production gains through 2022 tied to major legislative supports, while Trump’s single term saw more modest pre‑pandemic growth and net job losses by January 2021; however, the exact annualized manufacturing output growth rates for each calendar year 2017–2025 are not present in these materials and therefore cannot be reported here without consulting primary time‑series data from the Federal Reserve’s industrial production index or BEA manufacturing output tables to compute the year‑over‑year percentages [1] [2] [6] [4].