Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which specific degree programs were reclassified as non-professional by the U.S. Department of Education in 2025?
Executive summary
The Department of Education has circulated a proposal that would sharply narrow which programs count as "professional degrees," potentially cutting the list from roughly 2,000 to fewer than 600 and placing many health‑and‑education related degrees at risk of losing enhanced federal loan access [1] [2]. Multiple news and professional outlets report that nursing, physician assistant, occupational/physical therapy, audiology, speech‑language pathology, public health, social work, education, and several counseling/therapy and business/engineering master’s programs are among those named by advocates and social posts as likely to be excluded under the new definition — but those lists are drawn from the department’s proposal and secondary reporting, not a single definitive Department of Education final rule posted in the provided materials [3] [4] [5] [2].
1. What the Department proposed and the mechanics of reclassification
The Department’s proposal would require that a program be doctoral level (with a narrow exception for a Master of Divinity), require at least six years of academic instruction (two post‑baccalaureate), and be in the same four‑digit CIP code as one of 11 explicitly named professions for a program to qualify as “professional” and therefore gain access to the highest federal loan caps; that approach would markedly shrink the set of eligible programs compared with prior lists [2]. Inside Higher Ed summarizes this as the department’s plan after the RISE committee discussions and notes it is more restrictive than alternative proposals offered during negotiations [2].
2. Which degree programs reporting says are most affected
Multiple outlets and social posts circulating lists identify a broad set of programs that would lose “professional” status under the department’s narrower standard: advanced nursing degrees (MSN, DNP, NP), physician assistant programs, occupational therapy, physical therapy, audiology, speech‑language pathology, public health (MPH, DrPH), social work (MSW, DSW), education (including many teaching master’s degrees), counseling and therapy fields, and certain business and engineering master’s degrees [3] [4] [5] [1]. Nurse.org and multiple social posts specifically single out nursing programs as excluded in the department’s revamped definition and warn of impacts on loan and forgiveness eligibility for graduate nursing students [5] [3].
3. What’s confirmed in official versus social or advocacy reporting
The departmental proposal and reporting by Inside Higher Ed confirm a formal change in definition being advanced by ED negotiators and noted by the RISE committee [2]. However, social feeds and advocacy posts circulate expansive lists of named degree programs — some even present as a finalized ED reclassification — that go beyond the specific regulatory text excerpts in the provided materials; those posts appear to mix the department’s criteria with broader interpretations of which fields would be excluded [3] [4]. In short: the proposal’s criteria are official in the coverage provided [2], while the complete enumerations in social posts are secondary summaries or reader‑generated lists rather than an ED publication in the supplied sources [3] [4].
4. Stakes and who is raising alarms
Professional associations, higher‑education observers, and outlets focused on nursing and allied health emphasize that the proposed narrowing would “significantly limit loan accessibility” for critical healthcare degrees, potentially making advanced practice pathways more costly and harder to access [1] [5]. Inside Higher Ed and NASFAA coverage frames the change as part of larger negotiated rulemaking under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) and RISE committee discussions that have broad implications for Parent PLUS limits, legacy eligibility, and which federal loan caps apply to students [2] [6].
5. Conflicting viewpoints and missing confirmations
Advocates present lists suggesting dozens of degrees will be reclassified and treat the change as effectively finalized in places [3] [4]. The department’s documented proposal, however, is a rules definition that would produce results based on narrow criteria; how many and exactly which programs are ultimately excluded depends on applying those criteria to CIP codes and degree levels — a technical process not enumerated in the materials provided [2]. Available sources do not mention a definitive, department‑issued master list of every degree program reclassified as non‑professional (not found in current reporting).
6. What to watch next
Watch for a formal ED rulemaking release or a published list applying the three core criteria to federal CIP codes; that will show exactly which programs lose “professional” status and how many are affected [2]. Also monitor statements from professional organizations (nursing, public health, social work, education associations) and NASFAA for litigation, advocacy, or negotiated adjustments — those groups are already publicly criticizing the proposal in the supplied materials [5] [6].
Limitations: this summary relies only on the supplied reporting and social posts; those sources document the department’s restrictive proposal and list potential affected programs but do not provide a single, definitive ED list of every program reclassified [2] [3].