Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which undergraduate and graduate degrees were affected by the 2025 reclassification of 'non-professional' by the U.S. Department of Education?
Executive summary
Available reporting shows the 2025 Education Department reorganization changed which agency oversees many programs and—separately—there was at least one high-profile reclassification of a degree (nursing) from “professional” to “non‑professional,” affecting eligibility for a federal professional‑student borrowing cap; reporting names nursing specifically but does not provide a comprehensive list of all undergraduate or graduate programs reclassified [1] [2]. Major outlets describe large program transfers from ED to Labor, Interior, HHS and others, but they do not enumerate every degree affected by a “non‑professional” reclassification [3] [4] [2].
1. What the federal announcements actually did — a bureaucratic breakup, not a degree‑by‑degree revamp
The Department of Education announced six interagency agreements to transfer administration of many K‑12 and higher‑education programs to Labor, Interior, HHS, State and other agencies as part of a broader effort to downsize ED (U.S. Department of Education press release; Education Week; The New York Times) [3] [4] [2]. Those announcements and subsequent coverage focus on moving program oversight and offices, not on publishing a comprehensive catalog that renames or reclassifies specific undergraduate and graduate degree programs across the country [3] [4] [2].
2. Nursing explicitly flagged as reclassified from “professional” in local reporting
At least one news story identifies nursing degrees as having been reclassified so they “no longer count as a professional degree” under the Department of Education’s updated definition, with coverage linking that change to who qualifies for a $200,000 borrowing limit for professional students under a recently enacted law discussed by the Association of American Universities [1]. That article treats nursing as a concrete example of the redefinition’s effects [1].
3. Major national outlets describe program moves but do not list all reclassified degrees
National coverage in The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Guardian, Forbes and Education Week centers on the transfer of departmental functions and the political context — Project 2025, efforts to dismantle ED, and pushback from unions and higher‑education groups — rather than cataloging every degree label change [5] [6] [2] [7] [4]. These pieces document institutional shifts and who will administer programs, not a line‑by‑line reclassification of degree titles [5] [4] [2].
4. Why reporting may single out nursing — policy implications and borrower limits
Local reporting links the redefinition to federal borrowing caps created or clarified in recent legislation (reported as a $200,000 cap for professional students vs. lower graduate limits), explaining why a change in “professional” status matters for student loan limits and borrower classification; that linkage is why nursing drew attention in the Statesman piece [1]. National reporting about the department’s restructuring similarly emphasizes how administrative changes could reshape program oversight and eligibility rules — but does not itself list degree‑by‑degree eligibility changes [3] [2].
5. What the sources do not provide — no comprehensive list of affected undergraduate/graduate degrees
Available sources do not publish a full list of which undergraduate or graduate degrees were reclassified as “non‑professional.” The U.S. Department of Education’s press release and major news pieces describe program transfers and the political rationale, and one local paper reports nursing’s reclassification, but none supplies an exhaustive degree list or an official new definition applied across all fields [3] [2] [1].
6. Competing perspectives in the coverage — efficiency vs. risk of disruption
ED and administration statements frame the moves as “cutting through red tape” and returning education to states or better aligning programs with workforce goals [3] [2]. Critics — including teachers’ unions, education groups and associations like NASFAA — warn the changes could slash resources, create chaos if federal aid is decentralized, and produce disparate access across states [6] [8] [2]. Media coverage reflects both views: proponents highlight streamlined administration; opponents emphasize legal limits (Congress must act to abolish ED) and practical fallout [2] [8].
7. How to get definitive answers — where reporting points next
For a complete and authoritative list of which degrees were redefined as “non‑professional,” the next step is to consult the Department of Education’s formal rulemaking documents, an agency guidance memo, or the specific statutory language implementing the borrowing caps — materials not present in these search results. Current reporting signals the issue (nursing flagged) but does not contain the official, comprehensive reclassification list [1] [3] [2].
Limitations: this analysis relies only on the provided reporting; I do not assert any reclassification beyond what these sources explicitly state. Available sources mention nursing and widespread program transfers but do not list all affected undergraduate or graduate degrees [1] [3] [2].