Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which colleges and programs were directly affected by the 2025 reclassification of professional degrees?
Executive summary
The Department of Education’s RISE committee narrowed which degree programs count as “professional,” effectively cutting the universe from roughly 2,000 programs to fewer than 600 and limiting the set of fields eligible for the higher loan caps Congress created in OBBBA; negotiators agreed to recognize only about 11 primary program fields as professional [1] [2] [3]. That reclassification has been reported to directly affect nursing, physician assistant, advanced practice nursing (DNP/NP/CRNA/CNM), occupational therapy, audiology, public health (MPH/DrPH), and social work programs—each of which organizations say could lose access to higher federal loan limits under the new definition [1] [4] [5] [6] [7].
1. What the Department actually proposed: a tighter, CIP‑based list
The Department’s draft redefinition uses the regulatory definition in effect when OBBBA was enacted and then narrows eligible “professional degree” programs largely by 4‑digit CIP codes, producing a much shorter list of program fields that qualify for the higher loan caps; negotiators landed on recognizing roughly 11 primary fields [3] [2] [8]. Inside Higher Ed’s reporting confirms the department presented a slightly expanded list versus an earlier plan but emphasizes the new criteria programs must meet to be deemed professional [9].
2. Which programs organizations say are directly affected
Multiple professional associations and outlets identify nursing and several allied and public‑health professions as directly impacted: American Nurses Association and Nurse.org report nursing has been excluded from the “professional degree” category [5] [6], ASPPH warns that MPH and DrPH exclusion would constrain access to higher loan limits [4], and CSWE says social work graduate programs would be limited by the department’s definition [7]. Threads and other summaries list physician assistant, advanced nursing degrees (DNP, NP, CRNA, CNM), occupational therapy, and audiology among programs losing professional status [1].
3. Why loan access and workforce arguments dominate the reaction
The practical consequence cited across groups is financial: OBBBA sets higher annual and aggregate federal loan limits for students in professional programs (e.g., programs awarding a professional degree would have higher caps than other graduate students), so reclassifying a program changes how much federal borrowing and certain legacy Parent PLUS rules apply to those students [3] [8]. Professional associations frame the change as a threat to pipelines—ANA and others argue that excluding nursing and related programs jeopardizes recruiting and retention in underserved areas [5] [4] [7].
4. Competing rationales from ED and critics
Department negotiators framed the change as a “rational compromise” to produce clearer, consistent criteria for what constitutes a professional degree and to align with the statute and regulatory text [10] [9]. Critics, including professional societies and higher‑education groups, argue the CIP‑centric and limited checklist approach creates artificial exclusions—leaving similarly rigorous programs without professional status—and could constrain workforce supply where shortages already exist [2] [7] [4].
5. What is uncertain or not yet documented in these sources
Available sources do not mention an exhaustive list of specific colleges affected (institution names are not provided in the cited reporting), nor do they quantify exactly how many students at each program will lose eligibility; the materials instead focus on program types and fields (not found in current reporting). Also, while some pieces say the department reduced the count of programs to under 600 from ~2,000, the exact final program count and final 11 recognized fields are described variably and remain to be finalized in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and subsequent rule text [1] [2] [3].
6. What happens next and what advocates are doing
The Department is expected to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking opening a public comment period; professional groups (ASPPH, ANA, CSWE, AAU, NASFAA) are mobilizing comments and analysis arguing for inclusion or for clearer, less disruptive criteria [4] [5] [7] [2] [8]. NASFAA and others have produced guidance and flowcharts to help aid administrators interpret who will be considered a “professional student” under the draft rules [8].
7. Bottom line for readers and institutions
The reclassification is program‑level, not institution‑wide: it changes which fields qualify for higher federal loan caps and thus can materially affect student financing in nursing, public health, social work, physician assistant, and multiple allied health programs as reported by major associations; exact institutional impacts and legal challenges remain possible and are still unfolding [5] [4] [7] [1] [2]. Readers seeking specifics about a campus or degree should watch the forthcoming NPRM and consult their institution’s financial‑aid office and relevant professional association guidance [9] [8].