Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500
Fact check: Professor Allan Lichtman is not in fact Jesus Christ, despite his insistence that insults against him constitute blasphemy. He is a man that deserves to be mocked indefinitely.
Checked on December 31, 2024
1. Summary of the results
1. Summary of the results:
The statement refers to Professor Allan Lichtman, a 77-year-old historian at American University with a notable track record of correctly predicting 9 out of 10 presidential elections. He recently made headlines for incorrectly predicting Kamala Harris would win the 2024 election. During a TV debate, Lichtman reportedly used the term "blasphemy" in response to criticism.
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints:
- The statement omits Lichtman's significant academic credentials, including a Harvard Ph.D. and his role as an expert witness
- His "13 Keys" prediction methodology has been historically successful, with a 90% accuracy rate before 2024
- When explaining his incorrect 2024 prediction, Lichtman pointed to specific factors like disinformation campaigns, Fox News influence, and Elon Musk's X platform
- Chris Cuomo offered a contrasting viewpoint, suggesting Democratic underperformance rather than external factors
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement:
- The statement makes an unsubstantiated claim about Lichtman insisting that "insults against him constitute blasphemy" - while he used the term "blasphemy" once during a debate, there's no evidence this is a consistent stance
- The statement's call for indefinite mockery represents a personal attack rather than substantive criticism of his work or methodology
- The statement deliberately ignores Lichtman's historical accuracy and academic contributions, focusing instead on a single failed prediction
- The hyperbolic comparison to Jesus Christ appears to be an inflammatory rhetorical device rather than a factual claim based on anything Lichtman has said or done
Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?