Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Which universities have cancelled Charlie Kirk's speaking events and why?

Checked on September 13, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The analyses provided do not mention any universities cancelling Charlie Kirk's speaking events due to his own actions or content [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. However, some sources report that Rep. Nancy Mace canceled all outdoor and public events, including an upcoming speaking gig on a college campus, due to security concerns after Charlie Kirk's assassination [1] [2]. It is essential to note that Charlie Kirk was shot and killed at Utah Valley University [3]. Other sources discuss the risks and consequences of open-air debates on college campuses [4] and the reaction of Utah Valley University students to Kirk's death [5]. Additionally, some universities have canceled events with certain speakers due to security concerns or a desire not to host events that could stoke division, but these cancellations are not specifically related to Charlie Kirk's speaking events [6].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key piece of missing context is the specific circumstances surrounding Charlie Kirk's assassination and how it has affected the scheduling of his speaking events [1] [2] [3]. Alternative viewpoints suggest that the cancellation of speaking events may be due to security concerns rather than the content of the events themselves [1] [2]. Furthermore, some sources highlight the challenges colleges and universities face in balancing free speech and safety [6], which may lead to the cancellation of certain events. The College Free Speech Rankings also provide an alternative viewpoint, rating colleges based on their support for free speech, but do not specifically mention Charlie Kirk or the cancellation of his speaking events [8].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may contain potential misinformation as it assumes that universities have cancelled Charlie Kirk's speaking events, when in fact, the analyses provided do not support this claim [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. The statement may also be biased towards implying that universities are censoring Charlie Kirk's views, when in reality, the cancellations mentioned are due to security concerns or a desire not to host divisive events [1] [2] [6]. Rep. Nancy Mace and other lawmakers may benefit from this framing, as it highlights their concerns for security and safety [1] [2]. On the other hand, Charlie Kirk's supporters may be misled by the statement, as it does not accurately reflect the circumstances surrounding the cancellation of his speaking events [1] [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What are the main reasons universities have cancelled Charlie Kirk's speaking events?
How does Charlie Kirk's organization, Turning Point USA, respond to event cancellations?
Which universities have faced backlash for hosting Charlie Kirk despite controversy?
What role do student protests play in the cancellation of Charlie Kirk's speaking events?
How do universities balance free speech with concerns over hate speech or inflammatory rhetoric?