Are Crossing Hurdles programs free or fee-based and how are they funded?
Executive summary
Crossing Hurdles appears in online company and job listings as an ed‑tech and recruitment/staffing initiative that mentors candidates for product management and consulting roles and markets customised hiring services, which strongly suggests it operates on a fee-based, commercial model rather than as a free public program [1] [2]. Public reporting in the supplied sources does not document any specific grants, philanthropic endowments, or government funding streams for Crossing Hurdles, and direct evidence of its revenue or funding structure is not available in the provided material [1] [2] [3].
1. What Crossing Hurdles publicly says it does — clues that it charges for services
Company profiles for Crossing Hurdles describe the organisation as an "ed‑tech initiative" that mentors candidates aiming for careers in product management and consulting and as a customised recruitment and staffing firm that matches organisations with top‑tier talent, language that aligns with paid upskilling and placement services rather than free public programming [1] [2]. The Internshala company summary specifically uses commercial marketing language — “Upskill and land your dream career — Limited period offer” — which is typical of fee‑based course or service promotions [1]. Separate job and careers listings for Crossing Hurdles on recruiting sites indicate a private company employment profile rather than a public program offering free services [3] [4].
2. Public listings and job boards reinforce a commercial identity
Multiple employment and company pages such as Dice, Glassdoor, Uplers and job listings point to Crossing Hurdles operating like a private firm hiring staff and advertising roles in recruitment, product and client services, which implies an underlying commercial business model that would generate revenue through client fees, course fees, or placement commissions — though those revenue mechanics are not explicitly documented in these listings [3] [4] [2].
3. What the sources do not say — no documented grant or government funding found
None of the provided sources supply evidence that Crossing Hurdles is funded by government grants, federal programs, or philanthropic endowments; the sources are company profiles, job pages, and aggregate listings without mention of external funding awards or public grant notices [1] [3] [2]. Because the available reporting is limited to commercial and employment platforms, there is no documented line‑item showing public or nonprofit funding in the supplied material, and asserting such funding would exceed what the sources support [1] [3].
4. Reasonable inferences about how Crossing Hurdles is likely funded — and why those are only inferences
Given the company’s positioning as an ed‑tech mentor and a customised recruitment service, the most plausible funding and revenue models are direct fees for training programs or subscriptions, placement or staffing fees charged to hiring organisations, and possibly contract work for corporate talent programs; those are common models for companies described in the same terms as Crossing Hurdles [1] [2]. However, those are inferences drawn from business descriptions and marketing copy in the sources — the reporting does not provide financial statements, pricing pages, client invoices, or grant notices to confirm which of these models Crossing Hurdles actually uses [1] [2].
5. Signals that merit scrutiny — marketing language, job ads, and third‑party listings
Marketing phrases such as promotional “offers,” the presence on commercial job boards, and classification on staffing and upskilling platforms are signals consistent with paid services and customer‑facing revenue models [1] [3] [2]. These same signals, however, can appear for subsidised programs if hosted by private partners, so they are suggestive but not definitive without direct price lists, terms of service, or public financial disclosures, which are absent from the provided sources [1] [2].
6. Bottom line and recommended next steps to confirm funding
The supplied reporting consistently positions Crossing Hurdles as a private, fee‑oriented ed‑tech and recruitment entity, but it does not contain explicit statements about program pricing or documented funding sources; therefore the most accurate conclusion is that Crossing Hurdles is presented as fee‑based in available profiles while funding details remain unreported in the provided material [1] [2] [3]. To move from inference to verification, review the organisation’s own website or terms of service for pricing, request client/participant invoices or scholarship policies, or obtain financial filings or grant agreements if Crossing Hurdles is registered as a nonprofit or recipient of public funds — materials that are not present in the current source set [1] [2].