Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Where can I find an official side-by-side comparison or changelog of the DOE 2024 vs 2025–2026 approved degree lists?
Executive summary
You can’t find a single official “side‑by‑side changelog” in the provided reporting; coverage shows the Department of Education issued a new proposal and lists that shrink the set of programs the agency treats as “professional” for loan‑cap rules, with many outlets reporting nursing and several health and education fields excluded (e.g., Newsweek, Nurse.com, USA Today) [1] [2] [3]. Inside Higher Ed notes DOE released a proposal to define professional programs and that the new list is much smaller than prior practice [4].
1. Where an official comparison would logically come from — and whether it exists in reporting
The natural place for an official side‑by‑side is a Department of Education rulemaking document or the negotiated rulemaking materials accompanying the One Big Beautiful Bill Act implementation; Inside Higher Ed reports the DOE released a proposal defining which post‑baccalaureate programs get higher loan caps and that the agency circulated its draft during the negotiation process [4]. Available sources do not quote a single DOE “changelog” file comparing the 2024 approved degree list to the 2025–2026 approved list in side‑by‑side format; rather, reporting summarizes the proposed new definition and lists of programs affected [4].
2. What the reporting says about what changed
Multiple news outlets and professional groups report the DOE’s new proposal significantly narrows the definition of “professional degree,” reducing the universe of programs receiving higher loan caps from thousands to a much smaller set; summaries repeatedly single out nursing and several allied health and education degrees as removed from the professional‑degree category [1] [2] [3]. Inside Higher Ed explicitly says the department’s proposal “slightly expands” a previously small list in one iteration but overall is a step toward a much narrower classification that differs from older practice [4].
3. Which degrees are repeatedly named as excluded or affected
Reporting consistently lists nursing (MSN, DNP and related advanced practice degrees) and a range of allied health programs (physician assistant, occupational and physical therapy, audiology, speech‑language pathology), public health degrees, social work, and some education degrees as excluded or at risk under the proposed definition; outlets including Newsweek, Nurse.com, ASHA and others highlight those fields [1] [2] [5]. Social‑media summaries and trade coverage echo this roster, though the precise program list varies across stories [6] [5].
4. Why advocates and institutions say this matters
Nursing and health‑education groups warn the reclassification could reduce graduate students’ access to larger federal loan caps and therefore affect enrollment and workforce pipelines; Nurse.com and AACN commentary emphasize potential impacts on funding for advanced practice nursing and the workforce [2] [7]. Newsweek and other outlets describe the practical effect: programs no longer treated as “professional” may face tighter borrowing limits under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act implementation [1].
5. Where to look for the definitive official documents (practical steps)
Based on coverage, the explicit DOE proposal and negotiated‑rulemaking materials are the primary official sources journalists cite — so check DOE rulemaking pages and the negotiated rulemaking committee releases for the RISE/OBBBA work (Inside Higher Ed references the DOE’s released proposal presented by Under Secretary Nicholas Kent) [4]. NASFAA’s coverage of the RISE negotiators also shows relevant committee summaries and Q&A that reflect proposed language changes and concerns [8].
6. Disagreements, caveats and limits in reporting
Outlets disagree on the scope and immediate impact: some report that nursing “no longer counts” as professional (for example, headline summaries in the Statesman and other outlets), while Newsweek notes a DOE spokesperson told them graduate nursing students “will likely not be impacted in terms of their loan eligibility” in the short term — showing official comments can temper alarming headlines [9] [1]. Professional associations like ASHA and AACN frame the proposal as excluding their fields and urge advocacy; the DOE, per reporting, says it is using an old regulatory definition but applying it narrowly [5] [10].
7. Bottom line — how to get a true side‑by‑side
If you want a formal side‑by‑side changelog, press the Department of Education for: (a) the proposed new professional‑degree list as published in the NPRM or negotiated‑rule documents, and (b) the immediately preceding official list used in 2024 (reporting suggests such lists are the core documents but does not show a single combined changelog) [4] [11]. In parallel, monitor reporting from Inside Higher Ed, NASFAA and trade associations (AACN, ASHA, Nurse.com) for interpreted lists and the DOE’s public statements [4] [8] [2] [5].
Limitations: available sources summarize DOE proposals and list‑style outcomes but do not provide a single, published DOE side‑by‑side changelog comparing 2024 to 2025–26 in the materials referenced above [4] [1].