Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which specific degree programs did the Department of Education reclassify as non-professional in 2025?
Executive summary
The Department of Education’s late‑2025 proposal would, according to multiple reports, remove many graduate health, education and social‑service programs from the agency’s list of “professional degrees,” a change that could reduce higher federal loan limits for those enrolled (e.g., nursing MSN/DNP, social work MSW/DSW, public health MPH/DrPH, physician assistant, occupational/physical therapy, audiology, speech‑language pathology, counseling) [1]. News coverage and trade groups report nursing and several allied‑health and education fields among those affected, while some outlets describe still broader exclusions such as architecture, accounting and business programs [2] [3] [4].
1. What reporters say was listed as “no longer professional”
News and fact‑check outlets list largely overlapping degree types alleged to be excluded. Snopes summarizes the items being circulated: education (including teaching master’s degrees); nursing (MSN, DNP); social work (MSW, DSW); public health (MPH, DrPH); physician assistant; occupational therapy; physical therapy; audiology; speech‑language pathology; and counseling/therapy degrees [1]. Newsweek and other outlets note nursing prominently, and Times Now / US News–style summaries include nursing, architecture, accounting, education, engineering, business master’s programs, counseling, and speech pathology among the fields named [2] [3]. Nurse.org frames the practical consequence: graduate nursing students would lose access to the higher federal loan limits that applied to professional degrees [4].
2. Is this a finalized “reclassification” or a proposal under discussion?
The Department’s action was reported as a regulatory proposal rather than a completed reclassification. Snopes emphasizes that as of its reporting the agency had not “reclassified” programs definitively because the proposal had not yet passed, and the department said it was returning to a narrow interpretation rooted in long‑standing regulations (34 CFR 668.2) [1]. NASFAA commentary likewise treats the move as part of an ongoing set of regulatory changes emerging from the administration and linked to broader policy goals [5].
3. Why this matters for students and professions
Multiple sources explain the practical effect: whether a graduate credential counts as a “professional degree” affects federal borrowing limits and sometimes access to loan forgiveness or favorable terms. Nurse.org explicitly warns graduate nursing students could lose access to the higher $200,000 borrowing limit previously available to professional students [4]. NASFAA and opinion pieces say the regulatory tweak could curtail federal aid access across entire fields and thereby influence workforce pipelines, especially in health and education [6] [5].
4. Responses from professional organizations and stakeholders
Professional associations have pushed back. Newsweek cites the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) criticizing the exclusion of nursing as disregarding progress toward parity across health professions and contradicting the department’s own definition that links “professional programs” to licensure and direct practice [2]. NASFAA and comments collected on its site show strong opposition framed around workforce shortages and equity — particularly that many affected fields are female‑dominated [6].
5. Points of disagreement and limits of current reporting
There is disagreement about scope and legal status. Some outlets present a broad list that includes non‑health fields like accounting, architecture and business master’s programs [3], while Snopes cautions that social posts overstated a final “reclassification” and that the department was invoking an older regulatory definition [1]. Rightsnewstime and Statesman‑type pieces assert sweeping reclassification of nursing and allied‑health programs but these are derivative and sometimes lack direct citation to the specific regulatory text [7] [8]. Available sources do not mention the exact regulatory language changes line‑by‑line; Snopes points readers to 34 CFR 668.2 but notes the agency’s narrower interpretation is the key practical shift [1].
6. How to interpret the reporting and what to watch next
Treat current lists as reporting on a proposed regulatory change rather than an enacted, irreversible relabeling: Snopes explicitly says the agency had not yet completed reclassification at the time of its piece [1]. Watch the Department of Education rule‑making docket and official Federal Register postings for the final text and effective dates; trade groups (AACN, NASFAA) will likely continue to submit formal comments and organize advocacy, which could alter the final rule or prompt Congressional or legal responses [2] [6] [5].
If you want, I can compile the specific lists from each outlet side‑by‑side and flag where they agree and diverge, or extract the exact passages in 34 CFR 668.2 that Snopes cites for the department’s historical definition [1].