Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which master's and doctoral programs did the Department of Education classify as non-professional in 2025?
Executive summary
Available reporting shows the Department of Education proposed a narrow definition of “professional” graduate programs in late 2025 that would limit which master’s and doctoral programs qualify for the higher loan caps created by the One Big Beautiful Bill; multiple outlets say nursing and many other fields were singled out for exclusion in the department’s draft, while the department and fact‑checkers note the rules were still proposals, not final [1] [2] [3]. The draft and committee discussions reportedly recognize about 10–11 “primary” professional programs and some doctoral programs, implying most other master’s and professional degrees (nursing, education, business master’s, social work, architecture, accounting, engineering, counseling, speech pathology and others) would be treated as non‑professional for borrowing limits under the proposal [1] [4] [5] [6].
1. What the Department proposed and why it matters
The Education Department released draft rules to implement H.R.1 (One Big Beautiful Bill) that would sharply limit which post‑baccalaureate programs count as “professional” and therefore qualify for the higher $50,000 annual / $200,000 lifetime borrowing thresholds for professional students created by the law; the department’s convened committee reached “consensus” on a narrowed list that recognizes only about 11 primary programs plus some doctoral programs as professional, substantially reducing the number of graduate programs that would keep higher loan access [1] [6].
2. Which programs reporting says were classified as non‑professional
News outlets, specialty sites and advocacy groups reported nursing was explicitly excluded from the department’s professional list in the draft (a change widely reported and protested), and other fields cited in coverage as removed or at risk include architecture, accounting, education, social work, engineering, business master’s programs, counseling/therapy, and speech‑language pathology. Those lists appear in multiple reports summarizing the department’s implementation moves and reactions from professional associations [2] [4] [5] [1].
3. How definitive are these lists — proposal vs. final rule
Fact‑checking and the department’s own statements emphasize these were draft proposals and committee recommendations, not an enacted reclassification: Snopes notes the rulemaking had not passed at the time of reporting and the department said final rules were expected by spring 2026 at the latest, meaning the lists in circulation reflect proposed — not final — agency decisions [3]. Inside Higher Ed reports competing internal proposals and that the department’s version was narrower than other committee members’ alternatives [6].
4. Stakeholder pushback and why they object
Nursing organizations (American Nurses Association, AACN) and higher‑education and professional groups argued that excluding advanced nursing programs (MSN, DNP, CRNA, CNM, CNS, APRN) and other fields would worsen workforce shortages and impede licensure pathways; advocacy and university groups publicly opposed the narrower definition, warning of harms to access and to fields that rely on graduate licensure and clinical training [5] [7] [1].
5. Disagreement in sources about whether programs were ‘reclassified’
News reports framed the change bluntly (“nursing no longer counts”), but Snopes and the department pushed back that a formal reclassification had not yet occurred and that the department invoked an older regulatory definition (34 CFR 668.2) while applying it narrowly; this is a key dispute: some outlets reported the practical effect already, while fact‑checkers and the agency insisted the process was ongoing [2] [3].
6. What reporting does not say or confirm
Available sources do not provide a single authoritative, itemized list published by the Department of Education naming every master’s and doctoral program removed from “professional” status; rather, reports synthesize committee outcomes and advocacy reactions to identify fields affected [1] [6]. If you need a definitive, itemized list from the Education Department, that specific document is not included among the current sources (not found in current reporting).
7. Practical next steps and what to watch
Follow the Department’s final rulemaking publications (expected by spring 2026 according to Snopes) for the authoritative list and read committee minutes or the RISE committee’s consensus documents for the exact programs recognized as professional; meanwhile, watch statements and petitions from nursing and other professional associations and higher‑education groups, which are already lobbying to reverse or soften the draft exclusions [3] [7] [1].
Limitations: this summary synthesizes the reporting and advocacy pieces available in the provided sources; it does not assert an official, exhaustive list from the Department because the sources show the proposal was still in rulemaking and the department and fact‑checkers cautioned that no final reclassification had yet been published [3] [1].