Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which master's and doctoral programs were affected by the Department of Education's 2025 reclassification?
Executive summary
Available reporting shows a U.S. Department of Education action in November 2025 that reallocated many ED responsibilities to other federal agencies and also changed which programs the department treats as “professional” for federal student-aid/borrowing limits — with nursing singled out in local reporting as no longer classified as a professional degree (see federal reassignments [1] [2] and local coverage on nursing [3]). Sources do not produce a single authoritative list of every master’s and doctoral program reclassified; available reporting highlights program-level shifts in responsibility and at least one reporting item about nursing’s status [1] [2] [3].
1. What the November 2025 ED “reclassification” actually was — reallocating agency responsibilities
The central federal action described in multiple outlets was not a narrow relabeling of specific graduate degrees but a set of interagency agreements that reassign many Education Department functions to other federal agencies — notably Labor, Interior, Health and Human Services, and State — as part of a broader push to “break up” the ED bureaucracy (U.S. Department of Education announcement and coverage) [1] [2]. Reporting frames this as moving program administration (grants, accreditation oversight, and some program offices) rather than item-by-item relabeling of academic degrees [1] [2].
2. How this action could affect graduate programs in practice
Journalistic and analyst pieces stress that outsourcing administrative responsibility — for example, moving some higher-education functions to Labor or HHS — can change which agency issues guidance, enforces rules, and oversees grants that affect colleges and graduate programs [1] [4]. Forbes and federal press materials emphasize potential operational impacts on programs that relied on ED-administered grants and compliance frameworks; those shifts could cascade into eligibility, reporting, and funding differences for institutions and students [1] [4].
3. The specific claim about nursing — local reporting flagged a degree-status change
At least one news outlet reported that the Education Department “reclassified” nursing so it “no longer counts as a professional degree,” noting that ED’s revised definition of “professional programs” changed which programs are eligible for the higher federal student-loan borrowing cap used for professional students [3]. That story treats nursing as an explicit example of programs affected by the change in definition [3]. The story implies student-finance consequences rather than academic accreditation or degree-content changes [3].
4. Limits of the available reporting — no single, comprehensive list in these sources
None of the provided items publishes a complete, enumerated list of master’s and doctoral programs reclassified by the department. The ED press release and major outlets describe shifts of program responsibilities among agencies (interagency agreements) and commentary on institutional impact [1] [2] [4], while a local piece highlights nursing’s changed status for loan-limit purposes [3]. Available sources do not list every master’s/doctoral program affected or a formal federal catalog of reclassified degree programs [1] [2] [3].
5. Competing perspectives and implicit agendas in the coverage
The federal press release frames the moves as efficiency and “returning education to the states,” emphasizing streamlined service and reduced red tape (Department of Education) [1]. Critics in major outlets and analysts warn the moves resemble steps toward dismantling the ED and could weaken support for colleges, historically Black institutions, and grant programs — a political framing consistent with wider partisan debates over the role of ED (The Guardian, New York Times, Forbes) [2] [5] [4]. Local coverage of nursing frames a student-protection angle — that the borrowing benefits for certain professional programs may shrink — which signals concern over student-financial impacts [3].
6. What to watch next for clearer answers
To get a definitive list of graduate programs explicitly reclassified or relabeled by federal rule or guidance, watch for: (a) a formal ED regulatory notice or guidance document listing program categories and loan-eligibility changes; (b) follow-up reporting from national outlets that cite such a notice; and (c) Federal Register entries or interagency memos that specify which program responsibilities moved to which agency — none of which appear in the current set of sources [1] [2] [3]. Available sources do not mention a consolidated public list of affected master’s and doctoral programs [1] [2] [3].
Summary judgment: reporting shows a broad reassignment of ED functions across agencies and at least one reported change to how the ED classifies nursing for student-aid purposes, but these sources do not supply a comprehensive, program-by-program list of master’s and doctoral degrees reclassified by the Department [1] [2] [3].