Which master's and doctoral programs were reclassified as non-professional by the Department of Education in 2025?

1. What you asked for — and what the current files show

You asked which master’s and doctoral programs the Department of Education reclassified as non‑professional in 2025. The documents provided in your search results include federal SBIR/STTR funding pages (Department of Energy and related portals), local reclassification guidance for teachers or English learners, and an advocacy brief about Project 2025 — none of these contain a Department of Education list or announcement about reclassifying graduate degrees as “non‑professional” in 2025 ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]}. Therefore, based on the supplied sources, no programs can be named.

2. Possible reasons you saw sparse or off‑topic results

The supplied results are weighted toward DOE/SBIR materials and local education reclassification procedures — topics that use the word “reclassification” in different contexts (funding cycles, teacher credential changes, English‑learner status) and so can confound keyword searches for graduate‑degree classification ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}. The result set also includes an advocacy document that discusses broader policy proposals affecting education funding (Project 2025) rather than a regulatory reclassification of degree types ^[5]. If searching government regulatory actions by the Department of Education, relevant results should come from ED.gov or Federal Register notices; those are not present in the set you provided (available sources do not mention an ED.gov reclassification document) ^{[1] [2]}.

3. How “reclassification” is used differently in the returned materials

The returns show at least three distinct uses of “reclassification”: (a) federal program funding notices (SBIR/STTR) that are unrelated to degree credential status (Department of Energy pages) ^{[1] [2] [3]}; (b) K–12 personnel or student status changes — e.g., teacher pay/credential reclassification guidance and English‑learner reclassification in district materials ^{[4] [6]}; and (c) policy advocacy documents that propose structural education changes ^[5]. None of these uses equate to the Department of Education changing the professional status of master's or doctoral degree programs ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]}.

4. What to look for if you want a definitive answer

For an authoritative list of program classifications or regulatory changes by the U.S. Department of Education, primary documents you should request or search for include: Federal Register notices from the Department of Education, official ED.gov press releases or rulemaking pages, and program‑specific guidance from ED’s Office of Postsecondary Education. Those kinds of documents are not among the supplied sources here (available sources do not include ED Federal Register notices or ED.gov press releases about graduate program reclassification) ^{[1] [2]}.

5. Possible alternative explanations and competing interpretations

If you saw claims elsewhere that certain graduate programs were reclassified as “non‑professional,” several possibilities explain discrepancies: the claim might refer to a state education agency decision (not federal), an institutional accreditation action, or a narrower change in financial‑aid classification rather than a Department of Education regulatory change — none of which are evidenced in the current source set. The Project 2025 brief in the set signals partisan policy proposals that could be conflated with actual regulatory changes; advocacy documents outline goals but do not equal enacted federal rulemaking ^[5].

6. Recommended next steps to verify or find the names of programs

To confirm whether any master’s or doctoral programs were reclassified in 2025 by the Department of Education, check: (a) the Federal Register for 2025 ED rulemakings; (b) ED.gov newsroom and the Office of Postsecondary Education pages for 2025 announcements; (c) state higher‑education agency notices if the claim pertains to state actions; and (d) institutional or accreditor statements if the claim arose from accreditation changes. Those sources are not in your provided set; the current materials do not support naming any reclassified programs (available sources do not supply this information) ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]}.