Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What are the DOE's 2026 definitions of professional and nonprofessional degrees and how do they differ from prior guidance?
Executive summary
The Department of Education’s 2026 rulemaking would adopt a much narrower legal definition of “professional degree,” recognizing roughly a small set of traditional fields as professional and excluding many health, education and applied-practice programs — a change that helps determine who can access the larger $50,000/year ($200,000 aggregate) professional loan caps vs. lower graduate limits of $20,500/year ($100,000 aggregate) starting July 1, 2026 [1] [2]. Multiple trade groups say the proposed list trims professional programs from roughly 2,000 to fewer than 600, excluding nursing, public health, audiology, speech-language pathology, physician assistant and other programs that previously relied on looser interpretations [3] [4] [5].
1. What the DOE’s 2026 definition says — a tighter, narrower list
Negotiated-rulemaking materials and reporting show the Education Department’s RISE committee agreed on a more restrictive, consensus definition that recognizes a limited set of degree types as “professional,” often privileging long-established learned professions (e.g., law, medicine) and certain doctoral-level programs; that narrower interpretation was the basis for identifying roughly 11 primary programs and select doctoral programs as professional for loan-cap purposes (p1_s6; [12] (NASFAA) — see discussion in p1_s6). The Department also emphasizes that its proposal “aligns with historical precedent” in the 1965 regulatory language even as it applies that language more tightly to implement the One Big Beautiful Bill Act loan limits [6] [7].
2. How this changes who can borrow how much — the dollar math matters
Under the rulemaking outcomes summarized by New America and other outlets, students in programs the DOE classifies as “professional” would be eligible for the higher annual and aggregate loan caps — $50,000 annually and $200,000 total — while other graduate students face $20,500 annual and $100,000 aggregate limits; Grad PLUS loans are also being terminated for future borrowing, and the new limits take effect for enrollments beginning July 1, 2026 [1] [6] [5].
3. Which programs are being excluded and who’s pushing back
Reporting and professional associations identify nursing, many advanced nursing degrees (MSN, DNP), physician assistant programs, audiology, speech-language pathology, public health (MPH/DrPH), occupational therapy, some architecture/accounting/education/social work programs and others as left off the DOE’s working “professional” list — provoking letters from the American Council on Education, statements from AACN and the American Nurses Association, and targeted advocacy from ASHA and ASPPH [8] [9] [10] [5] [4].
4. Department pushback and claims of precedent
The Education Department’s press office has responded that the agency is using a consistent, decades-old definition and that its consensus-based language is “historical precedent,” rejecting accusations that it has newly “stopped counting” certain fields and calling some criticism overblown [11] [6] [7]. Snopes’ reporting notes the department frames this as rulemaking to implement statutory loan provisions rather than a novel invention [7].
5. Practical effects and timing — who is protected, who is at risk
The DOE’s draft approach includes legacy/phase-in protections for students already enrolled as of June 30, 2026, but institutions, part‑time enrollees and program-switchers may face new prorated or institution-set limits starting July 2026, complicating financial planning for current students and financial aid offices [1] [5]. Professional groups warn workforce pipeline effects — for example, nursing organizations say exclusion will hinder graduate nursing education and exacerbate shortages; the DOE disputes characterizations that the change is unprecedented [10] [9] [6].
6. Where reporting disagrees or leaves open questions
Sources agree the rulemaking narrows the operational list and will take effect July 1, 2026, but they diverge on whether nursing and other programs “had previously” been definitively counted as professional in practice: the 1965 regulation lists example professions and says the list is “not limited to” those examples, which critics cite to argue nursing long qualified by practice and licensure, while the department argues its reading is consistent with historical precedent [8] [6] [7]. Exact program counts (figures like “from ~2,000 to fewer than 600”) appear in advocacy posts and social media and are reported by some outlets but are not uniformly documented in official DOE materials provided here [3] [2].
7. What to watch next — rulemaking and public comment
The DOE is expected to publish a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and open a public comment period before finalizing rules; trade groups (AACN, ASHA, ASPPH, AAU, ACE) urge institutions and stakeholders to submit comments and weigh legal risk and implementation details such as the program-of-study definition and legacy provisions [4] [2] [12]" target="blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">[12]. Available sources do not mention final legal challenges yet, though NASFAA notes potential legal risk stemming from vagueness in program definitions s1" target="blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">[12]" target="blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">[12].
Limitations: this summary relies only on the cited reporting and advocacy materials; available sources do not include the full, final DOE rule text in this packet, so exact statutory language, program lists and any revisions in the formal proposed rule are not reproduced here [7] [1].