Fact check: The Ethiopian Bible is the oldest and most complete bible on earth.

1. Summary of the results

The analyses consistently support the claim that the Ethiopian Bible is among the oldest and most complete biblical texts in existence. Multiple sources confirm that the Ethiopian Bible, also known as the Ge'ez Bible, contains 81-88 books compared to the standard 66 books found in most Protestant Bibles ^{[1] [2]}. The text dates back to approximately 330-350 CE or the 4th century AD, making it nearly 800 years older than the King James Version ^{[1] [3] [2]}.

The Ethiopian Bible includes several unique texts not found in Western Christian traditions, such as:

• The Book of Enoch
• The Book of Jubilees
• Esdras
• Baruch
• All three Books of Maccabee

These additional books provide what sources describe as "a unique perspective on early Christian history and theology" ^{[4] [1] [5]}.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original statement lacks important nuance about what constitutes the "oldest" and "most complete" Bible. While the analyses support the Ethiopian Bible's ancient origins, they don't address several critical points:

• Other ancient biblical manuscripts exist, such as the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, which may compete for the title of "oldest" depending on specific criteria used for comparison
• The term "most complete" is subjective and depends on which canonical tradition one follows - what Ethiopian Orthodox Christians consider complete differs from Catholic, Protestant, or Eastern Orthodox perspectives
• The analyses don't mention that the Ethiopian Bible's additional books were excluded from other Christian canons through specific historical decisions by church councils
• There's no discussion of manuscript preservation conditions or how complete the surviving texts actually are

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement presents an absolute claim ("the oldest and most complete") without acknowledging the complexity of biblical manuscript traditions. While the analyses support the Ethiopian Bible's significance, the statement oversimplifies a nuanced scholarly topic by:

• Ignoring competing ancient manuscripts that scholars also consider among the world's oldest biblical texts
• Presenting "most complete" as an objective fact rather than a perspective based on the Ethiopian Orthodox canonical tradition
• Failing to acknowledge that different Christian traditions have different definitions of what constitutes a "complete" Bible

The sources themselves appear to be primarily Ethiopian or pro-Ethiopian publications ^{[4] [5]}, which may have cultural or religious motivations to emphasize the Ethiopian Bible's supremacy over other ancient biblical manuscripts. A more balanced assessment would acknowledge the Ethiopian Bible as one of the oldest and most extensive biblical collections while recognizing other significant ancient manuscripts in the scholarly record.