Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which academic fields are most commonly reclassified from professional to non-professional status?
Executive summary
Available reporting shows at least three distinct kinds of “reclassification” discussed in recent sources: institutional/Carnegie classification changes that shift how colleges are grouped by program mix and award level (Carnegie 2025) [1]; employer or federal rule-driven reclassifications of workers from exempt to non‑exempt under overtime rules [2]; and ad hoc social-media claims about the Department of Education changing which degrees are treated as “professional,” which the Threads post attributes instead in part to DOL data practices [3]. The Carnegie work specifically notes shifts away from “highest degree awarded” toward academic subject and award-level focus as drivers of classification changes [1].
1. What “reclassification” can mean in higher education reporting
“Reclassification” is an umbrella term used in different contexts. The 2025 Carnegie Institutional Classification describes a methodological reclassification of institutions based on three dimensions — award level focus, academic program mix, and size — and explains that many changes between 2021 and 2025 stem from replacing “highest degree awarded” with examination of typical academic subjects and award levels [1]. That is an institutional-level analytical re-sorting rather than an individual student or credential losing value [1].
2. Which academic fields drive institutional reclassification decisions
Carnegie’s 2025 methodology makes clear that changes in an institution’s classification often follow shifts in the mix of fields in which it awards degrees; the classification therefore can move when degree production in particular subject areas rises or falls relative to others [1]. The source does not list specific fields that are “most commonly” reclassified from “professional” to “non‑professional”; it frames the change as a methodological pivot to program mix and award level rather than a ledger of individual fields moved between professional/non‑professional categories [1]. In short, available sources do not mention a ranked list of specific academic fields most commonly reclassified in Carnegie’s work.
3. Worker/employee reclassifications are a separate but related conversation
Universities and employers have also reclassified individual academic staff positions from exempt to non‑exempt under revised overtime rules, which forced reclassification based on salary thresholds and duties tests; the University of California–Santa Cruz guidance notes reclassification of non‑faculty academic appointees earning below the threshold to non‑exempt status after the revised FLSA rule took effect [2]. Those reclassifications concern employment status and overtime eligibility, not the academic “professional vs. non‑professional” label used in degree taxonomy [2].
4. Social media claims about which degrees the Dept. of Education “reclassified” are contested
A Threads post lists many degrees (nursing, PA, occupational/physical therapy, counseling, public health, education, social work, IT/engineering, business, arts, audiology, speech-language pathology) and asserts the Department of Education will “no longer consider” them professional degrees; the same post acknowledges a likely conflation with Department of Labor reclassification for labor and immigration statistics and notes the DOL finalized certain classifications effective July 1, 2025 [3]. The provided reporting does not present an official Department of Education notice endorsing the list; it suggests the claim conflates different federal datasets and agencies [3]. Therefore, available sources do not confirm a DOE-led blanket relabeling as described in the social-media post.
5. Where the gaps and disagreements lie
Carnegie’s documentation explains institutional classification changes and why they occurred (a shift in methodology), but it does not map that work onto the social-media list or to employment reclassifications [1]. The Threads post claims a sweeping DOE relabeling and attributes similar moves to DOL immigration/labor data, but the post itself admits the DOE notice cannot be located and that DOL actions are the likelier source [3]. Thus, the key disagreement is between social‑media claims of a DOE-driven relabeling and official explanations that attribute reclassification effects either to Carnegie’s methodological shift (institutional taxonomy) or to DOL statistical/occupational coding (labor/immigration), not to DOE policy as claimed [1] [3].
6. Practical implications and what we can reliably say
From Carnegie: institutions may appear in new peer groups or categories when the dominant fields they award degrees in change or when the classification method changes [1]. From campus HR guidance: individual academic appointments can be reclassified for overtime status based on salary/duties rules [2]. From social media: many claim lists exist of fields being relabeled as non‑professional, but those claims in this set of sources are not corroborated by an official DOE publication and may conflate DOL actions [3] [2] [1].
7. How to follow up and verify specific field reclassifications
To verify whether any federal agency has reclassified particular degrees as “professional” or “non‑professional,” consult the issuing agency’s official notices (DOE, DOL) or the Carnegie Classification updates and FAQs for institutional taxonomy [1] [3] [2]. The available sources here do not supply a definitive roster of fields most commonly moved from professional to non‑professional status; they instead show methodological change (Carnegie) and employment reclassification (FLSA/DOL) as the documented drivers [1] [2].