Does George Soros fund biblical education curriculum?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
There is no clear, credible evidence in the provided sources that George Soros directly funds a “biblical education curriculum.” The Open Society Foundations (OSF) and Soros-related networks fund education, higher‑education networks, and some faith‑adjacent NGOs, but claims that Soros finances explicit Bible‑based curricula come from partisan blogs and advocacy pieces rather than mainstream grant records or OSF publications [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. What Soros and OSF actually fund: secular education and higher‑education networks
George Soros has directed large sums to education broadly — including a $1 billion pledge to build the Open Society University Network and substantial grants to individual universities and scholarship programs — showing OSF’s focus on higher education, critical inquiry and access for marginalized groups rather than denominational religious curricula [2] [5] [6].
2. Where the “Soros funds churches or biblical curriculum” claim shows up
Concrete allegations that Soros funds Bible‑based curricula appear primarily in conservative and religious advocacy blogs and reports claiming “rent‑an‑evangelical” arrangements or that Christian‑left groups received Soros money (for example pieces on Sojourners and immigration outreach). Those sources argue influence but do not provide OSF grant records showing Soros paid for a formal biblical education curriculum itself [3] [4] [7].
3. The documentary evidence available in mainstream philanthropy records
Philanthropy‑facing sources and OSF documentation catalogue grants for arts, civil society, legal reform, and higher education; they document funding relationships with universities and civic groups, not direct underwriting of denominational Bible curricula in churches or parochial schools [1] [2] [6].
4. Examples cited by critics — what the records actually show
Critics point to specific relationships (e.g., grants to groups that engage religious communities or to networks that partner with faith‑based organizations). The sources here note such claims but also show dispute or denial by the targeted organizations (for example Sojourners’ denial of direct Soros funding) and rely on patchwork evidence rather than a clear OSF grant line to a biblical curriculum program [3] [4] [7].
5. Misinformation risks and political context
Soros is a frequent target of political narratives. Reporting and commentary in the provided selection highlight that OSF’s large, well‑publicized philanthropic footprint makes him a focal point for partisan claims and conspiracy framing; mainstream philanthropic coverage documents broad educational giving, while partisan sites frame relationships as ideological influence without showing direct grants for Bible instruction [8] [9] [10].
6. What is missing from the available reporting
Available sources do not mention any OSF grant explicitly labeled to create, distribute, or endorse a “biblical education curriculum” for churches, parochial schools, or Bible classes. The explicit claim that Soros funds Bible curricula is not substantiated in the philanthropy records, OSF descriptions, or the mainstream reporting provided [1] [2] [11]. Not found in current reporting: a line‑item OSF grant to a named organization to produce a denominational biblical curriculum.
7. Competing interpretations and how to evaluate them
One interpretation: Soros funds groups that sometimes work with faith communities, which critics interpret as an attempt to shape theology or church practice [3] [4]. The competing, documented view: OSF funds secular education, civil society, and universities; occasional grants to NGOs that engage religious audiences do not prove direct funding of Bible curricula [1] [2] [6].
8. Practical next steps for verification
To prove or disprove the specific allegation, consult primary OSF grant databases and recipient organizations’ public tax filings for any grant descriptions naming “biblical curriculum” or equivalent; none of the supplied sources contains that primary documentation [1] [11]. Where advocates cite secondary claims, ask for grant IDs or IRS 990s and corroborating items from recipient organizations.
Limitations: This analysis relies solely on the documents and links you provided. Those sources show extensive Soros funding for education and civic causes [2] [6] and a stream of partisan accusations about influence in religious circles [3] [4], but they do not include a direct OSF grant record funding a biblical education curriculum.