Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which fields historically granted professional degrees like law, medicine, and theology, and when did this start?
Executive summary
Western universities have long treated law, medicine and theology as the three “higher” professional faculties dating back to the medieval period (11th–13th centuries), with doctorates first awarded in mid‑12th century in civil law at Bologna and theology at Paris [1] [2]. Modern debates about which programs count as “professional degrees” (e.g., recent U.S. rulemaking that excludes nursing from a tightened federal list) rest on a regulatory definition from 1965 and recent policy changes that list specific fields such as medicine, law, dentistry and theology while omitting many health and social‑care programs [3] [4] [5].
1. Medieval origins: the three higher faculties that became “professional”
Medieval European universities structured study into a lower faculty (arts) and three higher faculties — theology, medicine and law — that were meant to prepare students for the chief public and ecclesiastical roles of the age; after an MA a student could pursue these higher faculties and, by the 13th century, the doctorates and masters in them were standard [1] [6] [7]. Scholarship and institutional history emphasize that theology was often the most prestigious of the three, but all three were understood as professional pathways for clergy, physicians and jurists [8] [9].
2. When did “professional” degrees first appear in name and practice?
The earliest formal recognition of doctorates as professional/teaching credentials dates to the mid‑twelfth century: the University of Bologna awarded doctorates in civil law and the University of Paris in theology; canon law followed soon after and medicine by the thirteenth century [2]. Those medieval doctorates were awarded to recognize teachers (doctors) in the higher faculties — a functional origin for what later became modern professional degrees [2] [10].
3. Continuity and change: how the medieval model shaped modern professional degrees
The quartet of arts plus the higher three faculties established an academic architecture still visible today: MA/BA foundations, then specialized professional training in law, medicine, and theology. Over centuries the names, levels and regulatory meanings shifted (for example, modern professional degrees can be bachelor, master or doctoral level depending on country and field), but the medieval hierarchy left a durable template for professional credentialing [7] [11].
4. Variations and exceptions: legal and institutional caveats
Universities developed unevenly: some early institutions emphasized theology because of papal control, others (like Bologna) concentrated on law, and the practical content of medical instruction also varied by place and period [1] [12]. Modern degree nomenclature can obscure level: some UK professional degrees named “bachelor” are at master’s level, and some “doctor” titles may be classified differently in qualifications frameworks [11]. Available sources do not mention a single universal start‑date beyond the medieval milestones above.
5. Today’s policy fights: the U.S. definition of “professional degree” and who’s included
In U.S. federal rulemaking tied to the “One Big Beautiful Bill” and related Department of Education action, officials relied on a long‑standing regulatory definition (dating in form to 1965) that historically cited fields such as law and medicine; the recent policy narrowed or listed specific fields (medicine, pharmacy, dentistry, law, veterinary medicine, optometry, theology, clinical psychology, etc.) and—controversially—did not explicitly include nursing and certain public‑health programs [3] [5] [13]. Critics (professional associations and unions) argue that excluding such programs will reduce access to higher loan limits and harm workforce pipelines; the Department’s press office defends the consistency of its historical definition [4] [14].
6. Competing perspectives: institutional precedent vs. modern workforce needs
Histories of universities show a precedent for privileging law, medicine and theology as learned professions [9] [1]. Proponents of the tightened U.S. definition point to regulatory continuity and the need to define eligibility for higher federal loan limits precisely [5]. Opponents stress that health‑care and public‑health degrees (nursing, public health, social work) function as professional training in today’s health system and that excluding them signals an implicit agenda that can disadvantage primarily female and service‑oriented fields [15] [16].
7. What readers should keep in mind
Historical practice supports the special status of law, medicine and theology as early professional faculties and shows when doctorates first formalized for those subjects (mid‑12th to 13th centuries) [2] [1]. But legal definitions used for contemporary policy are administrative choices that can omit historically related or functionally professional fields; sources show active dispute over whether the modern regulatory list should reflect medieval precedence, current workforce needs, or a narrower statutory interpretation [2] [5] [16].
If you want, I can map a concise timeline (centuries and key institutions) or summarize the specific professional fields named in the recent U.S. Department of Education rulemaking with exact citation excerpts.