Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which institutions saw the largest enrollment drops after the 2025 non-professional reclassification?
Executive summary
Available reporting in the provided results does not list specific institutions and enrollment-count outcomes after a 2025 reclassification; coverage focuses on which degree types (not individual schools) were proposed to be de‑listed as “professional” and on sectorwide concerns about reduced access to loans for nursing and other graduate programs (see Newsweek and NASFAA analysis) [1] [2]. Nurse.org and NASFAA emphasize that reclassification would affect graduate nursing programs’ access to higher loan limits and could reduce enrollment by working, low‑income, rural, and first‑generation students [3] [2].
1. What the “non‑professional” reclassification actually targeted
The materials in the search set explain that the 2025 proposal reinterpreted which graduate degrees qualify as “professional” for federal loan‑limit purposes, naming examples and excluding programs such as many advanced nursing degrees; the Newsweek summary highlights debate over why some fields (e.g., theology) remained counted while nurse practitioners were not [1]. NASFAA’s explainer frames the change as altering annual and aggregate loan limits tied to the regulatory definition in 34 CFR 668.2, meaning eligibility rules would shift for categories of degrees rather than singling out specific colleges [2].
2. Who watchdogs and industry groups said would be hurt
NASFAA warned that reclassification “would reduce access to essential financial aid and loan structures,” and that the burden would fall disproportionately on working nurses, low‑income students, rural students, and first‑generation learners who rely on professional‑degree loan protections [2]. Nurse.org similarly frames the removal of nursing from “professional” status as directly impacting graduate nursing students’ ability to access federal loans and loan‑forgiveness pathways, and links that to broader workforce and patient‑care consequences [3].
3. What the sources do not provide — the missing institutional enrollment data
None of the supplied documents list which individual universities, colleges, or programs experienced the largest enrollment drops after the reclassification; Newsweek and NASFAA treat the change at the programmatic and policy level, and Nurse.org focuses on nursing broadly rather than providing institution‑level enrollment numbers [1] [2] [3]. Therefore, claims about “largest enrollment drops” at named institutions are not found in current reporting.
4. Why institution‑level enrollment effects would be complex
Based on the policy descriptions, enrollment impacts would be mediated by students’ ability to access higher loan limits and forgiveness: programs that relied heavily on graduate students who need large loans (e.g., MSN, DNP, CRNA, certain APRN pathways) could be more vulnerable, but actual declines would also depend on schools’ scholarship aid, local labor demand, and state funding — factors not detailed in the available pieces [2] [3]. Newsweek signals uncertainty in how degrees have historically been counted and notes the regulatory definition’s ambiguity, which would further complicate predictable, uniform drops across institutions [1].
5. Competing perspectives and political context
Newsweek highlights political pushback and puzzlement about which degrees were classified as professional, quoting a political commentator on X about perceived inconsistencies between theology and nursing classifications, implying political calculations may have shaped outcomes [1]. NASFAA and Nurse.org frame the change as an equity and workforce risk; those opposing the reclassification emphasize student financial harm and downstream healthcare staffing effects [2] [3]. Available sources do not present a detailed defense from the Department of Education explaining why particular institutions or programs would not be harmed, beyond rearticulating regulatory definitions [1].
6. What evidence would be needed to answer your original question
To identify which institutions saw the largest enrollment drops after the 2025 reclassification, reporting or datasets would need to include: (a) program‑level enrollment figures before and after the rule change; (b) breakdowns by degree type (MSN, DNP, CRNA, etc.); and (c) controls for other factors (e.g., pandemic effects, program closures, state policy changes). None of these datasets or institution lists appear in the supplied coverage [1] [2] [3].
7. Bottom line for researchers and reporters
Current sources document the policy change’s scope and warn about broad sector effects, especially for graduate nursing, but they do not supply institution‑level enrollment outcomes; any claim naming the “largest drops” at specific colleges is not supported by the provided material and would require targeted enrollment data or follow‑up reporting [2] [3] [1].