Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Is Michael Israetel's dissertation available in ProQuest or university repository?
Executive Summary
Michael Israetel’s 2013 doctoral dissertation, "The Interrelationships of Fitness Characteristics in Division 1 Athletes," is cataloged in East Tennessee State University’s Electronic Theses and Dissertations collection and appears in ProQuest’s dissertations listing; access to the full text is restricted at the author’s request, so users generally encounter metadata and an abstract rather than an open PDF [1] [2]. The dissertation is therefore discoverable both via the university repository and via ProQuest indexing, but obtaining the complete document likely requires author permission or institutional access steps. This summary synthesizes repository metadata and ProQuest indexing evidence while flagging access restrictions as the decisive practical constraint.
1. How the record shows up — discoverable but bounded by restriction
East Tennessee State University’s Electronic Theses and Dissertations system lists Israetel’s 2013 Ph.D. dissertation with a specific repository identifier and provides the citation and abstract, confirming the work’s official archiving in the university repository; however, the record is noted as restricted at the author’s request, which prevents straightforward download of the full text for the general public [1]. Institutional metadata and the abstract are visible, which means libraries, researchers, and search engines can confirm the dissertation’s existence and bibliographic details, but the repository’s access controls are the limiting factor. The presence of a repository entry is a standard academic practice for archived dissertations, yet the restriction shifts the practical barrier from discoverability to permissioned access.
2. ProQuest’s role — indexing versus full-text availability
ProQuest’s Dissertations & Theses database lists Israetel’s dissertation and includes it among high-access listings, indicating the work is indexed there with a ProQuest document ID (noted in repository analyses), which supports the claim that ProQuest includes the record in its curated collection [2] [3]. ProQuest commonly provides both metadata and full-text files when rights are cleared, but the existence of a ProQuest index entry does not guarantee an immediately downloadable PDF for non-subscribers or when the author has placed embargoes or restrictions. The combined presence in ProQuest and the university repository means the dissertation is part of the permanent scholarly record, but practical access will depend on ProQuest subscription status and the author’s chosen restrictions.
3. Why access may be blocked — author embargoes and repository policies
Multiple repository notes indicate the dissertation is restricted at the author’s request, a practice used when authors place embargoes, delay release for publication or commercial reasons, or limit distribution for other considerations [1]. University repositories and aggregators like ProQuest honor those restrictions, so a restricted dissertation will show metadata and an abstract but block the full-text file unless a user gains permission through the institution, contacts the author, or waits out the embargo. The practical consequences are consistent across sources: discovery is possible, but full access requires either institutional credentials, direct permission from the author, or changes to the embargo status.
4. Practical steps to obtain the full dissertation — channels that work
Given the mixed signals—repository listing plus ProQuest indexing but an author-requested restriction—the typical paths to the full dissertation are: request it via interlibrary loan through a subscribing institution, search ProQuest if you have institutional access and see if the embargo has lifted, or contact East Tennessee State University’s graduate school or the author directly to request permission [1] [2]. The sources note that metadata and abstract are public, so these channels enable citation verification and an initial read of the scope; obtaining the full text will hinge on permission or subscription. Users without institutional access should plan to contact the repository or the author for a controlled release or verification.
5. What the sources agree on and where they diverge — the bottom line for researchers
All provided analyses concur that Israetel’s dissertation exists in East Tennessee State University’s repository and is represented in ProQuest’s listings, establishing clear bibliographic availability [1] [2]. They diverge only in emphasis: university repository records highlight the restriction at author request, while ProQuest-related notes emphasize that the work is indexed and appears in ProQuest’s top-access lists [3]. The practical implication is uniform across sources: the dissertation is discoverable in both venues, but access to the complete document is constrained and requires appropriate credentials or permissions. Researchers should therefore treat the dissertation as verifiable but access-controlled and pursue institutional or author-mediated channels to obtain the full text [1] [3].