Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500
$

Fact check: New Jersey just passed a law that teachers don't need to pass Reading, English and Math to get a teaching certificate.

Checked on January 16, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The statement is technically accurate but significantly oversimplified. New Jersey has indeed passed Assembly Bill 1669/P.L.2024, c.26, which eliminates the requirement for teachers to pass the Praxis Core Academic Skills test in reading, writing, and mathematics [1]. The law was signed by Governor Phil Murphy in June 2024 and became effective January 1, 2025 [2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original statement omits several crucial pieces of context:

  • Teachers must still meet multiple other requirements, including:
  • Graduating from an accredited teacher preparation program with a minimum 3.0 GPA [3]
  • Completing months of student teaching experience [3]
  • Passing subject-specific Praxis II tests [2]
  • Obtaining a bachelor's degree [4]
  • The law does not apply universally - it excludes limited certificates of eligibility (CE) and limited certificates of eligibility with advanced standing (CEAS) [1]
  • This change is part of a broader national trend of states adjusting certification barriers to address teacher shortages [4]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement presents the change in a way that could mislead readers to believe New Jersey has completely eliminated educational standards for teachers, which is false. Several groups have stakes in how this policy change is presented:

  • Teacher Unions: The New Jersey Education Association supports the change, viewing the previous testing requirement as an unnecessary barrier to entering the profession [2]
  • Education Reform Critics might benefit from presenting this as a lowering of standards, while omitting the fact that the eliminated test was considered "duplicative and costly" [3]
  • State Government: Benefits from presenting this as a solution to teacher shortages, which was the primary motivation behind the law [2]

The key point of contention is whether removing this specific test requirement represents a meaningful lowering of standards or the elimination of an unnecessary barrier, given the multiple other requirements that remain in place.

Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?