Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What is the role of the Swedish Academy in selecting Nobel Prize winners?
Executive Summary
The Swedish Academy is the body that selects and announces the Nobel Prize in Literature; it is a distinct institution from the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, which selects laureates in Physics, Chemistry, and the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel. Selection responsibilities are divided among multiple Swedish institutions—most notably the Swedish Academy, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, and the Karolinska Institute—and the process is governed by long-standing rules of nomination secrecy and institutional remits [1] [2] [3]. Recent summaries of these roles date from September–October 2025, reflecting consistent institutional responsibilities [1] [3].
1. Who actually picks each Nobel prize and why this matters
The Nobel prize architecture assigns distinct institutions specific subject-matter responsibility, not a single centralized “Nobel committee.” The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences is entrusted with selecting laureates in Physics and Chemistry and announces the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, reflecting a mandate to cover core scientific disciplines [4] [5]. The Karolinska Institute handles the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, while the Swedish Academy handles Literature; the Peace Prize is awarded by the Norwegian Nobel Committee. This division matters because each institution uses its own expert committees, procedures, and historical norms to evaluate candidates, shaping disciplinary priorities and selection criteria [1].
2. What the Swedish Academy’s specific remit looks like in practice
The Swedish Academy’s role is predominantly literary: it receives nominations, deliberates through internal committees, and announces the Nobel Prize in Literature [2]. Unlike the scientific academies, the Swedish Academy’s evaluation rests on literary judgment, translation reach, and cultural interpretation, which are inherently more subjective. The analysis supplied underscores the institutional separation: references to the Swedish Academy’s press information show it as the official announcer for Literature, reinforcing that the Academy has exclusive authority in that field, and that confusion between similarly named academies can obscure public understanding of who does what [2].
3. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences’ authority and scope
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences exerts formal authority over the Physics, Chemistry, and Economics prizes, operating Nobel Committees within those domains to vet nominations, consult external experts, and make decisions that the Academy then ratifies and announces [4]. Sources note the Academy’s long-standing role in awarding these prizes annually and emphasize its institutional mechanisms, including panels and secrecy rules, that structure evaluation. The Academy also announces the economics prize, which was established later than the original Nobel Prizes but is administered under the Academy’s processes, reinforcing its central position in scientific Nobel selection [5].
4. Secrecy and procedure: the opaque routines behind the laureates
All relevant sources highlight strict confidentiality and procedural norms that govern Nobel selection, especially within the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences’ committees for Physics, Chemistry, and Economics. The secrecy rules are designed both to protect deliberative candor and to prevent lobbying, and they shape why external descriptions of the internal reasoning are limited to official statements at announcement times [3]. This structural secrecy means that public analyses rely on institutional summaries and past announcements, which can leave unanswered questions about deliberative criteria and the relative weighting of factors such as novelty, reproducibility, and societal impact.
5. Confusion between academies: a common public misconception
Multiple supplied analyses point to a frequent public conflation of the Swedish Academy and the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, despite their separate legal identities and remits [1] [4]. This confusion leads to misstatements about who “selects” Nobel winners and can obscure that literature, scientific, and economic prizes follow different nomination channels and expert networks. The distinction is important for accountability and for understanding the disciplinary values embedded in each institution’s selection culture; relying on precise institutional names corrects misunderstandings evident in contemporary summaries [1] [4].
6. Gaps and omissions in the sourced analyses
The material supplied includes at least one analysis irrelevant to Nobel selection—and that omission is notable because it underscores how public discussions sometimes conflate civic or ecclesiastical events with Nobel institutional roles [6]. Additionally, while several pieces describe the Royal Swedish Academy’s responsibilities, fewer provide granular detail on the Karolinska Institute’s procedures for Medicine or on how the Norwegian Nobel Committee differs for Peace, revealing an informational gap that can mislead readers about the full ecosystem of Nobel decision-making [7] [1].
7. Bottom line: clear division, multiple actors, and continued secrecy
The consolidated evidence shows a clear institutional division: the Swedish Academy handles Literature; the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences handles Physics, Chemistry, and Economics; Karolinska handles Medicine; and the Norwegian committee handles Peace, with consistent documentation in September–October 2025 sources [1] [3] [5]. The selection process remains institutionally siloed and confidential, which explains recurring public confusion and the need to cite precise institutional roles when explaining who selects Nobel laureates [4] [2].