Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Which degrees did the Trump-signed law reclassify out of 'professional' status and when did the change take effect?

Checked on November 25, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

The Department of Education’s recent regulatory proposal tied to President Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” limits which graduate programs count as “professional degrees,” and news outlets report nursing, social work, counseling, public health, education, architecture and accounting among programs now excluded from that list while medicine, law, dentistry, pharmacy, optometry, veterinary medicine, osteopathy, podiatry, chiropractic, theology and clinical psychology remain listed [1] [2] [3]. The change is being implemented as part of the law’s new loan rules with key provisions — including new annual and lifetime caps and the end of Grad PLUS — scheduled to take effect July 1, 2026 [4] [5] [6].

1. What the rule change actually does, in plain language

The Trump administration’s regulatory proposal interprets an old federal definition of “professional degree” and lists a narrower set of programs that will qualify for the larger loan limits under the new law; programs not on that list would be subject to lower borrowing caps and lose access to Grad PLUS borrowing that previously allowed students to cover full costs [3] [2]. Under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, “professional students” would face an annual cap of $50,000 and a $200,000 lifetime cap, while many graduate students face lower annual and lifetime limits — and Grad PLUS would be eliminated — starting when the new loan system is implemented [5] [7].

2. Which degrees are explicitly being kept as “professional”

Reporting shows the Department’s list retains traditionally listed fields such as medicine, pharmacy, dentistry, optometry, law, veterinary medicine, osteopathic medicine, podiatry, chiropractic, theology and clinical psychology as examples of professional degrees [1] [2]. Multiple outlets quote that same roster when describing the Education Department’s proposed definition [3].

3. Which degrees are reported as being reclassified out of “professional” status

Several news organizations and specialty outlets report that nursing — including advanced nursing degrees (MSN/DNP) and related clinical practice programs such as nurse practitioner tracks — along with social work, counseling, public health, education, architecture and accounting are among those no longer included in the Department’s professional-degree list under the new interpretation [2] [8] [9] [10]. Coverage varies in which specific programs are named, but nursing is the most frequently cited omission and the focal point of public outcry [2] [11].

4. When the changes take effect and who will be affected

Multiple outlets report that the new loan rules tied to the One Big Beautiful Bill take effect on July 1, 2026; that is when the borrowing caps and the end of Grad PLUS are scheduled to be implemented, and when classification-driven changes to loan eligibility would begin to constrain students in newly excluded programs [4] [5] [6]. Some pieces note current students may be “grandfathered” or that implementation specifics will be governed by Department rulemaking and transition language [9] [3].

5. Why the Department says it took this approach — and critics’ counterarguments

The Department points to a 1965 federal definition that describes a professional degree as one that “signifies both completion of the academic requirements for beginning practice in a given profession and a level of professional skill beyond that normally required for a bachelor's degree,” and argues it is relying on those original examples when drafting regulation [3] [7]. Critics — including nursing organizations and some higher-education experts — say the Administration’s interpretation is narrowly literal, excludes many licensure-based clinical professions (notably nursing), risks worsening workforce shortages, and appears to privilege historically entrenched professions such as medicine and law [2] [1].

6. What’s uncertain or missing from current reporting

Available sources do not mention full, program-by-program regulatory text that definitively lists every degree and the Department’s legal rationale in final form; much reporting is based on the Department’s proposed interpretation, media summaries, and reactions from professional groups [3] [7]. Also not yet fully clear in reporting is how transition rules, grandfathering, state licensure interplay, or congressional fixes might alter outcomes before July 1, 2026 [9] [5].

7. Bottom line for students, institutions and policymakers

If the proposal stands as reported, students in excluded programs — most prominently nursing and some allied health and social-service fields — could face substantially reduced federal borrowing options beginning July 1, 2026, because the new law caps borrowing and eliminates Grad PLUS; institutions and professional associations are mobilizing to contest or seek revisions to the classification and implementation [5] [2] [9]. Lawmakers, courts or the Department’s own rulemaking process could still change specifics between now and implementation; the press coverage shows both the legal basis cited by the Department and the sharp pushback from affected professions [3] [2].

Want to dive deeper?
Which federal law did President Trump sign that reclassified certain degrees from 'professional' status?
What criteria determine whether a degree is classified as 'professional' under U.S. federal law?
How does reclassifying degrees from 'professional' affect student loan repayment and forgiveness eligibility?
Which institutions or academic programs were most impacted by the reclassification and have they challenged it legally?
Have there been subsequent legislative or regulatory changes reversing or modifying the reclassification since it took effect?