Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What is the average GPA and LSAT score for admitted students at the University of Florida Levin College of Law?
Executive Summary
The materials provided contain a single explicit historical data point: the University of Florida Levin College of Law reported a median LSAT of 160 and median GPA of 3.60 for its entering class in 2016. The other supplied documents do not report current admissions metrics, and one focuses on bar passage rates rather than admissions statistics, leaving the current average/median profile unresolved in these sources [1] [2] [3].
1. What the supplied documents actually claim and omit
The set of analyses yields two distinct claims and omissions: one source supplies a specific historical median LSAT and GPA for the 2016 entering class, while two others explicitly provide no admissions profile numbers. The TaxProf Blog-derived item states median LSAT 160 and median GPA 3.60 for 2016, establishing a concrete historical benchmark [1]. The official “Entering Class Profile” summary contains no admission metrics in the excerpt provided and thus omits the numerical profile, while the bar-passage piece centers on licensure outcomes, not admissions credentials [2] [3]. These omissions matter for anyone seeking current data.
2. How trustworthy and timely each claim is — dates and scope matter
The 2016 median figures are explicit and quantifiable but are dated and therefore may not represent current admissions standards; the TaxProf Blog entry is timestamped in 2016 and is the sole source of numerical claims in this set [1]. The other two items have different emphases and publication timing: the general entering-class summary appears to be older and non-numeric in this excerpt (2016 note in metadata), while a 2024 piece discusses bar passage rates but does not address recent LSAT/GPA figures [2] [3]. The disparity in dates shows a gap between historical admissions metrics and recent reporting.
3. Reconciling a historical benchmark with current information needs
Using the 2016 medians as a benchmark provides one reasonable historical point of reference: median LSAT 160, median GPA 3.60 [1]. Those figures indicate the competitiveness of the program at that time and can be compared with national medians for context, but they cannot be assumed to reflect present admissions thresholds without newer data. The lack of updated admission statistics in the 2024 bar-passage-focused report means the dataset here cannot support claims about current admitted-student averages or medians [3]. Analysts and applicants should treat the 2016 numbers as historical, not definitive for today.
4. What is missing from these sources that matters to applicants and researchers
The supplied materials omit several critical, current data elements: most recent entering-class median/average LSAT and GPA, ranges (25th–75th percentiles), application/admission yield rates, and matriculant diversity or trend data. The “Entering Class Profile” excerpt, despite its title, lacks numeric values in the supplied analysis, creating a gap. The 2024 article focuses on outcomes (bar passage) rather than inputs, leaving the current selectivity and academic profile of incoming classes unaddressed in these documents [2] [3] [1].
5. Multiple viewpoints and possible agendas in the available documents
The three-source set shows differing institutional emphases: a blog reporting historical admissions numbers, an admissions-oriented page that in this excerpt omits stats, and a news piece highlighting bar passage performance. Each has potential agenda-driven framing: the law school’s materials often prioritize narrative and outcomes, media pieces may highlight positive trends like bar passage, and third-party blogs may spotlight snapshot metrics for comparison. Readers should note these lenses when interpreting the lone numerical claim and the absence of updated admissions figures [1] [3] [2].
6. How to bridge the gap responsibly if you need current admissions numbers now
Given the lack of recent admissions metrics in the provided set, the responsible next step is to consult the law school’s official, up-to-date entering-class profile and ABA-disclosed disclosures, which routinely list median and percentile LSAT/GPA, application counts, and matriculant characteristics. The supplied sources do not supply that current dataset; therefore any assertion about current averages would be beyond what these documents substantiate [2] [1] [3]. Use official ABA 509 reports for authoritative, current figures.
7. Bottom line — what can you conclude from only these materials?
From the supplied materials alone, the only supported numerical conclusion is the 2016 entering-class median LSAT of 160 and median GPA of 3.60, which functions as a documented historical point but not as contemporary evidence of current admissions standards [1]. The other documents do not contradict that historical data but do not update it; they affirm that current data are absent from this collection, and therefore any present-day averages cannot be responsibly stated without additional, more recent sources [2] [3].