How do sanctions and restrictions on naphtha/diluents affect Venezuela’s ability to export heavy crude?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Sanctions and maritime restrictions on naphtha and other diluents strike at the practical heart of Venezuela’s heavy‑oil export model: without adequate diluent, extra‑heavy Orinoco crude cannot be blended to flow for pipelines or tankers, sharply raising the cost and risk of exports [1] [2]. Recent U.S. moves to block sanctioned tankers and pressure suppliers — combined with a pivot to Russian naphtha that itself now faces interdiction risk — have already widened discounts, forced cargo cancellations, and created credible scenarios in which Venezuela temporarily loses hundreds of thousands of barrels per day of exportable production [3] [4] [5].
1. Why diluent is the operational choke point for Venezuela’s oil exports
Venezuela’s Orinoco Belt produces extra‑heavy crude that is effectively “sludge” at ambient temperatures and must be blended with light products like naphtha to reach pipeline‑ and refinery‑acceptable API gravity; that blending is not cosmetic but operational — without diluent the oil won’t flow or load for export [1] [2] [6]. Suppliers of diluent therefore become strategic partners: historically the U.S. supplied much of this feedstock, but since 2023 and through 2025 Russia has increasingly filled the void, and companies such as Chevron have also supplied naphtha to joint ventures to keep barrels moving [6] [4] [7].
2. How sanctions and vessel restrictions interrupt that supply chain
Sanctions operate on two levels relevant to diluent: legal measures targeting suppliers and vessels, and maritime enforcement that can seize or blockade sanctioned tankers — measures that have already caused Russian naphtha shipments to divert and some tankers to turn back offshore rather than discharge in Venezuela [3] [2] [8]. Analysts and tanker‑tracking firms report that a meaningful share of Venezuela’s naphtha imports travel on ships now sanctioned by western authorities, so a targeted blockade or seizures directly reduce available diluent stocks [8] [2].
3. Immediate commercial consequences: discounts, cargo cancellations, and output risk
The squeeze on diluents has translated into real market effects: PDVSA has been forced to offer much deeper discounts to Asian buyers as sanctioned crude floods markets and loading risk rises, and traders and documents show PDVSA and partners increased naphtha imports earlier in 2025 to try to stabilize blends — but that buffer is fragile [4] [9]. Reporting and analyst estimates warn that if diluent flows are materially cut, Venezuela could lose substantial export capacity — Reuters and industry observers cite worst‑case production losses up to roughly 500,000 bpd — and cargo cancellations and cancelled loadings have already dented monthly export tallies [5] [10] [4].
4. Market workarounds, buyers and the shadow fleet: partial resilience, rising costs
Venezuela has demonstrated short‑term resilience by rerouting to buyers like China and by sourcing diluent from alternative suppliers (notably Russia), and by using “shadow fleet” arrangements to obscure shipments; yet those same workarounds raise transaction costs, lengthen voyages, increase insurance and seizure risk, and force heavy discounts that transfer the economic pain to PDVSA [7] [8] [4]. Moreover, increased U.S. scrutiny and naval deployments have already prompted tanker diversions and encouraged some naphtha cargos to seek new buyers elsewhere, undercutting Venezuela’s recent access to Russian diluent flows [2] [3].
5. Structural limits and political calculus: why sanctions bite but don’t instantly halt exports
Sanctions and diluent restrictions are a blunt but effective lever because they target the physical necessity of blending; nevertheless their impact is bounded by several factors: U.S. waivers (e.g., special licences for Chevron JV operations) preserve a base level of production and diluent flow, Venezuela’s stockpiles and earlier imports create temporary buffers, and buyers willing to accept higher risk (often at deep discounts) can keep some volumes moving [11] [12] [4]. At the same time, long‑term production is constrained by chronic underinvestment in upstream maintenance — meaning sanctions can deepen declines but cannot magically restore lost capacity once wells and infrastructure deteriorate [7].
Conclusion — likely scenarios and incentives
In practice, restrictions on naphtha and diluents are an efficient pressure point that can sharply raise export costs, force steeper discounts, trigger cargo cancellations and — if sustained and combined with maritime enforcement — remove many hundreds of thousands of barrels per day from the market for months; yet total collapse is unlikely immediately thanks to waivers, stockpiles, alternative suppliers, and buyers prepared to accept risk, meaning the policy achieves attrition and revenue denial more than a clean shutdown [5] [11] [8]. Readers should note competing agendas in the reporting: some outlets emphasize U.S. policy aims and security rationales for interdictions [3] [6], while market‑facing journals stress logistical and price impacts [4] [8]; both perspectives explain why diluent controls are central to Venezuela’s export vulnerability.