Fact check: On average, how many much of the voice talent listed on ACX.com is still active?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, no concrete data exists to answer the question about what percentage of voice talent listed on ACX.com remains active. The sources examined do not contain specific statistics or metrics regarding voice talent activity rates on the platform.

However, the analyses do provide some indirect indicators:

• ACX mentions that "thousands of authors are looking to work with independent or studio narrators" ^[1], suggesting a substantial narrator pool
• One source indicates that competition is "very deep" and there are "many fine, experienced audiobook narrators out there" ^[2]
• Anecdotal evidence suggests that "many voice actors have found success and built their portfolios through ACX" ^[3]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question assumes that data about voice talent activity rates on ACX is publicly available or easily accessible, but the analyses reveal this information is not readily disclosed by the platform. Several important contextual factors are missing:

• Platform integrity concerns: One analysis reveals that fraudulent activities occur on ACX, with some rights holders claiming ownership of books they do not own, and narrators losing work and compensation as a result ^[4]. This suggests that measuring "active" talent may be complicated by platform reliability issues.
• Economic factors affecting activity: The analyses mention changes to ACX's royalty model ^[5], which could significantly impact narrator participation rates and activity levels.
• Verification challenges: ACX does not adequately vet titles or rights holders, leaving it up to narrators to research and verify the legitimacy of projects ^[4], which may affect how many narrators remain consistently active.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains an implicit assumption that could be misleading:

• Availability bias: The question presumes that activity data for ACX voice talent is publicly tracked and available, when the analyses show no sources provide this specific information ^{[6] [7]}.
• Definitional ambiguity: The question doesn't define what constitutes "active" voice talent, which could range from recently logged-in users to those actively completing projects or earning income.

The question appears to be seeking factual data that simply does not exist in the public domain, making it impossible to provide an accurate numerical answer based on available information.