Beth Upton height
Executive summary
Available reporting and public records in the supplied sources do not state a height for Dr Beth Upton; searches return news coverage of a tribunal where Dr Upton is central but no physical-statistics data (not found in current reporting). Sources that discuss "Upton" heights refer to unrelated celebrity Kate Upton or general “Beth” name pages, not the doctor at the centre of the NHS Fife case [1] [2] [3].
1. What the public record actually shows about “Beth Upton”
Contemporary news coverage and the published tribunal judgment identify Dr Beth Upton as the second respondent in the Sandie Peggie employment tribunal and focus on the changing-room dispute, professional conduct and procedural questions — not on biographical physical details such as height [1] [4]. Major outlets covering the case, including BBC News and the judiciary’s published judgment, describe the incidents, legal findings and procedural history without listing bodily measurements [1] [4].
2. Why height information is missing from credible sources
The most relevant materials in the search results are legal and news documents designed to record events, testimony and legal reasoning; they routinely omit personal physical statistics unrelated to the dispute. The tribunal judgment and live reporting concentrate on allegations, findings of harassment by NHS Fife, and evidential assessments rather than private biographical trivia [4] [1].
3. Confounding results: celebrities and generic name pages
Some search hits about “Upton” return pages about model Kate Upton or generic celebrity-height aggregators named “Beth” that are unrelated to the doctor in Scotland. For instance, multiple lifestyle and celebrity sites report Kate Upton’s height as about 5ft 10in — a separate person with no connection to Dr Beth Upton — and a CelebHeights index lists many people named Beth but does not substantiate the doctor’s height [2] [5] [3]. Relying on those results would conflate distinct individuals.
4. What journalists and the tribunal have focused on instead
Coverage by BBC, The Guardian and regional outlets frames Dr Upton in relation to testimony, credibility and the tribunal’s findings (for example, that the tribunal found NHS Fife had harassed Ms Peggie but dismissed claims against Dr Upton). These reports emphasize legal rulings, the December 24, 2023 confrontation, and the tribunal’s assessment of witness reliability — not demographic minutiae [1] [6] [7].
5. Privacy, relevance and plausible reasons to avoid reporting physical stats
When reporting on employment tribunals and medical professionals, outlets often withhold or do not seek physical attributes like height because they are irrelevant to the legal issues. The supplied sources show active discussion about name redaction and sensitivity around identity details — for example, debates over redacting Dr Upton’s birth name from tribunal documents — underscoring editorial caution about unnecessary personal data [8].
6. How to find verified height data if it exists
Available sources do not provide Dr Beth Upton’s height. If height is essential for your purpose, the next steps would be: check authoritative biographical profiles or a personal/professional website for the individual (the supplied “about me” page in the results appears to be for a different Beth and is unrelated to the Scottish doctor) and consult primary public records only if they are lawfully published [9]. Note: the supplied “about me” site describes a meditation teacher named Beth born in 1982 — that page is not tied to the tribunal reporting and should not be treated as the same person without corroboration [9].
7. Bottom line and caution against conflation
Do not infer a height for Dr Beth Upton from celebrity pages or generic “Beth” listings; the reporting and judgment that directly concern the Scottish tribunal do not mention height [1] [4]. Conflating different Uptons (e.g., Kate Upton) or using unverified aggregators risks spreading misinformation. Available sources do not mention Dr Beth Upton’s height.