Is Beth Upton taller than Sandie Peggie
Executive summary
Available reporting does not provide reliable, stated heights for either Beth Upton or Sandie Peggie, so a definitive answer to “Is Beth Upton taller than Sandie Peggie?” cannot be drawn from the sources at hand; court and news coverage mention physical appearance and height only as subjective courtroom argument, not measured data [1] [2] [3]. Media files and tribunal documents focus on conduct, identity and legal findings rather than comparative heights [1] [2] [4].
1. What the sources actually say about height and appearance
During the tribunal reporting, Sandie Peggie’s counsel argued it was “obvious in person” that Dr Beth Upton was male based on several physical attributes including “height” and “gait,” but that is an assertion made in advocacy, not a stated measurement or independent fact [1]. Other news and tribunal coverage mention appearance and identity repeatedly, but none of the provided articles record an exact height for either party [2] [3].
2. Courtroom rhetoric versus verifiable facts
The claim about “height” appears within an adversarial context: lawyers seeking to resist anonymity argued physical traits made sex obvious in person [1]. Legal arguments about what is “obvious” are rhetorical and intended to influence judicial decisions; they are not the same as empirically measured heights and should not be treated as proof that one person is taller than the other [1].
3. What the tribunal and press focused on instead
Reporting examined allegations of bullying, harassment, and employer failings, and produced a 312‑page ruling detailing how NHS Fife handled the dispute — not biographical metrics like height [3]. The media interest centers on legal outcomes, workplace policy and the public debate about sex and gender rights, not on comparative physical statistics [5] [6].
4. Why no direct answer can be given from available reporting
None of the supplied sources contain measured heights, photographs with verifiable scale, or official biographical data listing heights for Beth Upton or Sandie Peggie. When a question calls for a numerical comparison but the sources lack that data, the responsible journalist’s answer is: the sources do not supply it [1] [2] [3].
5. How such a question has been weaponised in the dispute
Height and other physical features have been deployed in court filings and by campaign groups as evidence to support wider claims about sex and privacy, which highlights an implicit agenda: to use appearance as proof of sex and therefore to justify exclusion from women‑only spaces [1] [7]. Readers should note that appearance-based arguments serve advocacy goals in this litigation context and are not neutral measurements [1] [7].
6. Where you could look next for a definitive answer
If a precise comparison is required, look for primary sources that would record height explicitly: medical or professional registration records that list height (if public), direct biographical profiles naming height, or authenticated photos with scale. None of these are present in the current set of sources (p1_s1, [8], [9] — these provide biographies but not heights).
7. Bottom line for readers
Available reporting does not mention specific heights for Beth Upton or Sandie Peggie; courtroom references to “height” are argumentative, not factual measurements [1] [3]. Therefore you cannot responsibly say whether Beth Upton is taller than Sandie Peggie based on the supplied sources.