What are the sources of the rumors about Brigitte Macron's birth gender?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The rumors about Brigitte Macron's birth gender have two primary sources based on the available analyses:
Primary Source - Candace Owens: Conservative influencer Candace Owens is identified as the key figure who revived and amplified these conspiracy theories [1] [2] [3]. Owens created a YouTube video titled "Is France's First Lady a Man?" and has since produced numerous videos promoting this false claim [2]. She has also sold merchandise based on these conspiracy theories [2]. Owens specifically claimed that Brigitte is "a very goofy man" [1].
Secondary Source - Far-Right Websites and QAnon: The rumors originally emerged from far-right websites and were circulated by conspiracy theorists, including those from the QAnon movement [4]. These sources preceded Owens' involvement but gained significantly more traction through her platform.
Specific False Claims: The rumors falsely claim that Brigitte Macron was born male under the name Jean-Michel Trogneux, which is actually the name of Brigitte's brother [1] [4].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Legal Consequences: The analyses reveal that these rumors have resulted in multiple defamation lawsuits. The Macrons have sued Candace Owens in a Delaware court, with their lawyer seeking "substantial" damages [1]. Additionally, two women are on trial in France for defamation over similar false claims [5].
Pattern of Targeting Powerful Women: The conspiracy theories about Brigitte Macron are part of a broader pattern of similar false claims targeting prominent women, including Michelle Obama and Kamala Harris [3]. This suggests a systematic approach to undermining powerful women through gender-based conspiracy theories.
Escalation of Harm: The false gender claims have led to more serious accusations of child abuse against Brigitte Macron [5], demonstrating how conspiracy theories can escalate and cause additional harm.
Financial Motivation: Candace Owens has monetized these false claims by selling merchandise related to the conspiracy theory [2], indicating a financial incentive to continue spreading misinformation.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question appears neutral and factual in seeking information about the sources of these rumors. However, there are some considerations:
Framing as "Rumors": While the question appropriately frames these as "rumors," it's important to note that these are demonstrably false claims that have resulted in legal action for defamation [1] [5].
Lack of Context About Harm: The question doesn't acknowledge that these rumors have caused "tremendous damage" to the Macrons [2] and have escalated beyond simple gender speculation to more serious false accusations [5].
Missing Broader Pattern: The question focuses specifically on Brigitte Macron without acknowledging that this is part of a systematic pattern of targeting powerful women with similar conspiracy theories [3].