Picture of a brigitte Macron in the kids
Executive summary
The claim space around Brigitte Macron has been dominated by a long-running online conspiracy that she was born male — a falsehood that a Paris court treated as malicious harassment and for which 10 people were convicted in January 2026 cyberbullying-france-5f78de63dc14f765e509a004006808a2" target="blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">[1][2]. The available reporting does not document or corroborate any specific item described as a “picture of a Brigitte Macron in the kids,” and the sources instead focus on defamatory rumors, courtroom findings, and related lawsuits [3][4].
1. What the courts actually found: online abuse, not photographic proof
A Paris tribunal found 10 defendants guilty of cyberbullying for repeatedly posting degrading and false claims about Brigitte Macron’s gender and sexuality — including assertions that she had been born male — and handed down one jail term and several suspended sentences while emphasizing the cumulative harm of repeated publications [1][3][5].
2. The conspiracy at the center: an identity swap that isn’t supported by evidence
The smear campaign recycled a false claim that Brigitte Macron was born under the name “Jean-Michel Trogneux,” which is in fact the name of her brother; news reports and the Macrons’ own legal filings describe that allegation as demonstrably false and central to the harassment [1][4][6].
3. Family testimony and personal harm: human consequences cited in court
Brigitte Macron’s daughter, Tiphaine Auzière, testified that the phoney allegations damaged her mother’s health and daily life, forcing Brigitte Macron to constantly monitor her appearance because “her image can be distorted,” and the court cited the deterioration in quality of life as part of its assessment [7][8][6].
4. U.S. litigation and transnational amplification: how the rumor spread beyond France
The Macrons have pursued a separate defamation suit in the United States against commentator Candace Owens for amplifying and monetizing similar claims, with the complaint alleging a campaign of global humiliation tied to repeated falsehoods, including the core assertion that Brigitte Macron is a man [4][2].
5. Media framing and the broader information ecosystem
Journalists and analysts treating the case saw it as symptomatic of a toxic online culture in which conspiracy theories gain traction because of resentment toward elites and distrust in mainstream media; some defendants defended their posts as jokes or debate, underscoring tensions between free expression and legal limits on targeted harassment [2][9].
6. The specific question — “picture of a Brigitte Macron in the kids” — and what reporting shows
None of the cited reporting documents or describes a photograph matching the phrasing “a Brigitte Macron in the kids”; instead, coverage concentrates on defamatory text, false identity claims, court rulings, and the Macrons’ legal responses, so the public record in these sources does not support the existence or circulation of any verifiable “picture” as asked [1][3][5].
7. Competing perspectives and implicit agendas
Defenders of the convicted posters argued their remarks were harmless banter or political critique, while victims and prosecutors framed the campaign as malicious and monetized disinformation; outlets ranging from AP and The New York Times to The Guardian and French press emphasized both the reputational damage and the political context, while partisan sites cast the convictions as overreach — revealing divergent agendas around free speech, reputational protection, and political warfare [1][2][9].
8. What the sources don’t say and limits of this review
The assembled reporting does not catalog every image or social-media post ever circulated about Brigitte Macron, and it does not provide evidence of a photograph described as “in the kids”; therefore it is not possible, on the basis of these sources alone, to assert definitively whether any isolated image exists outside the documented defamatory narratives and legal records cited here [1][4][3].